PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTQX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTQX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTQX achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly higher than FFGZX's 4.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PLTQX has outperformed FFGZX with an annualized return of 10.54%, while FFGZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.28% annualized return.


PLTQX

1D
0.39%
1M
4.46%
YTD
9.40%
6M
9.81%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
10.54%

FFGZX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.75%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.42%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTQX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
9.40%17.25%14.58%18.16%-17.90%17.09%15.41%23.86%-8.61%19.16%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.28%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTQX and FFGZX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.74

The correlation between PLTQX and FFGZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (5 years) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTQX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTQX
PLTQX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PLTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTQX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTQXFFGZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.54

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.18

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.92

14.23

+0.69

PLTQX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTQX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTQXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.64

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.65

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.97

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.93

-0.23

Drawdowns

PLTQX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTQX drawdown since its inception was -29.05%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTQX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTQXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.05%

-14.94%

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-3.33%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-4.76%

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-14.94%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

-14.94%

-14.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-2.26%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

0.74%

+0.85%

Volatility

PLTQX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.49%. This indicates that PLTQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTQXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

1.49%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

3.34%

+4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.94%

4.01%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.38%

5.08%

+8.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.80%

4.43%

+9.37%

PLTQX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTQX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PLTQX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

PLTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than FFGZX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.21%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
4.11%4.50%4.19%3.14%8.95%5.00%3.85%3.84%4.47%2.37%2.34%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTQX and FFGZX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTQX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to FFGZX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTQX dropped -29.05% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTQX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer