PLTI vs. OMAH
PLTI (REX PLTR Growth & Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
PLTI vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTI achieves a -20.94% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 5.24% return.
PLTI
- 1D
- -4.31%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- -20.94%
- 6M
- -22.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 5.24%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 12.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTI vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTI REX PLTR Growth & Income ETF | -20.94% | -9.13% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 5.24% | 1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTI and OMAH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTI vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
PLTI
OMAH
PLTI vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX PLTR Growth & Income ETF (PLTI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTI | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | 0.74 | -1.53 |
Drawdowns
PLTI vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTI drawdown since its inception was -35.05%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTI and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTI | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.05% | -11.83% | -23.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.15% | -2.02% | -26.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.96% | -1.26% | -18.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.22% | — |
Volatility
PLTI vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTI | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.01% | 8.06% | +46.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.01% | 13.18% | +41.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.01% | 13.18% | +41.83% |
PLTI vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTI vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
PLTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.20%, less than OMAH's 15.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.34% | 12.86% |
PLTI REX PLTR Growth & Income ETF | 12.20% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTI and OMAH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTI.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.34%, compared with 12.20% for PLTI.
They also come from different issuers: REX and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTI and 0.95% for OMAH.
Find the right allocation for PLTI and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer