PLTI.L vs. QQQO.L
PLTI.L (IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP) and QQQO.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while QQQO.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTI.L returned -34.05% vs 25.70% for QQQO.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQQO.L.
Performance
PLTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PLTI.L is traded in USD, while QQQO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QQQO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTI.L achieves a -32.76% return, which is significantly lower than QQQO.L's 10.57% return.
PLTI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.92%
- 6M
- -31.80%
- YTD
- -32.76%
- 1Y
- -34.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQO.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 25.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTI.L IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP | -32.76% | 10,807.19% |
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 10.57% | 14.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTI.L and QQQO.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTI.L vs. QQQO.L — Risk / Return Rank
PLTI.L
QQQO.L
PLTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP (PLTI.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTI.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.31 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.93 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 1.40 | -2.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTI.L drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, which is greater than QQQO.L's maximum drawdown of -27.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTI.L and QQQO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTI.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.14% | -27.72% | -31.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.14% | -27.72% | -31.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.06% | -15.59% | -39.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.79% | -10.06% | -22.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.09% | 18.36% | +19.73% |
Volatility
PLTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP (PLTI.L) has a higher volatility of 14.53% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) at 6.71%. This indicates that PLTI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTI.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.53% | 6.71% | +7.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.83% | 11.91% | +20.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.68% | 43.63% | +19.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9,906.58% | 5,487.63% | +4,418.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9,906.58% | 5,487.63% | +4,418.95% |
PLTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Dividend Comparison
PLTI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.80%, less than QQQO.L's 77.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PLTI.L IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP | 57.80% | 11.63% | 0.00% |
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 77.51% | 128.94% | 17.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTI.L and QQQO.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQO.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQO.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PLTI.L.
PLTI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQO.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PLTI.L and 0.45% for QQQO.L.
Find the right allocation for PLTI.L and QQQO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer