PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTI.L vs. ARAW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTI.L vs. ARAW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP (PLTI.L) and abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PLTI.L is traded in USD, while ARAW.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ARAW.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTI.L achieves a -32.76% return, which is significantly lower than ARAW.DE's 5.54% return.


PLTI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.92%
6M
-31.80%
YTD
-32.76%
1Y
-34.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARAW.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.04%
6M
-10.45%
YTD
5.54%
1Y
78.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTI.L vs. ARAW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PLTI.L
IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP
-32.76%10,807.19%
ARAW.DE
abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF
5.54%75.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTI.L and ARAW.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTI.L vs. ARAW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTI.L
PLTI.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PLTI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

ARAW.DE
ARAW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ARAW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARAW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARAW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ARAW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARAW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTI.L vs. ARAW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP (PLTI.L) and abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTI.LARAW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.33

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

3.15

-3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

8.28

-9.17

PLTI.L vs. ARAW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTI.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the ARAW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTI.L and ARAW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTI.L vs. ARAW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTI.L drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, which is greater than ARAW.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTI.L and ARAW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTI.LARAW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.14%

-24.52%

-34.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.14%

-24.52%

-34.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.06%

-20.05%

-35.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.79%

-5.81%

-26.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.09%

9.31%

+28.78%

Volatility

PLTI.L vs. ARAW.DE - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP (PLTI.L) has a higher volatility of 14.53% compared to abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) at 9.72%. This indicates that PLTI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARAW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTI.LARAW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.53%

9.72%

+4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.83%

28.78%

+4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.68%

41.41%

+21.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9,906.58%

39.30%

+9,867.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9,906.58%

39.30%

+9,867.28%

PLTI.L vs. ARAW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ARAW.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTI.L vs. ARAW.DE - Dividend Comparison

PLTI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.80%, while ARAW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLTI.L and ARAW.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARAW.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARAW.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PLTI.L.

PLTI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while ARAW.DE is Materials. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PLTI.L and 0.45% for ARAW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTI.L and ARAW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer