PLTG vs. FNGG
PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) and FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. PLTG is actively managed, while FNGG is passively managed. Over the past year, PLTG returned -47.73% vs 24.13% for FNGG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PLTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for FNGG.
Performance
PLTG vs. FNGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTG achieves a -55.06% return, which is significantly lower than FNGG's 15.08% return.
PLTG
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -54.21%
- YTD
- -55.06%
- 1Y
- -47.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNGG
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 19.44%
- YTD
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 24.13%
- 3Y*
- 47.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTG vs. FNGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | -55.06% | 100.70% |
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 15.08% | 59.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTG and FNGG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025 | 0.52 |
The correlation between PLTG and FNGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTG vs. FNGG — Risk / Return Rank
PLTG
FNGG
PLTG vs. FNGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTG | FNGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.12 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 0.56 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 1.41 | -2.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTG vs. FNGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTG drawdown since its inception was -80.11%, smaller than the maximum FNGG drawdown of -91.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTG and FNGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTG | FNGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.11% | -91.33% | +11.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.11% | -43.01% | -37.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -47.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.46% | -14.89% | -54.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.16% | -55.06% | +20.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.86% | 17.17% | +29.69% |
Volatility
PLTG vs. FNGG - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) has a higher volatility of 31.48% compared to Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) at 13.24%. This indicates that PLTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTG | FNGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.48% | 13.24% | +18.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 80.35% | 35.36% | +44.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.79% | 43.49% | +59.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.70% | 67.44% | +38.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.70% | 67.44% | +38.26% |
PLTG vs. FNGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGG's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTG vs. FNGG - Dividend Comparison
PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.36%, more than FNGG's 10.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 10.34% | 11.89% | 0.79% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 4.99% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | 40.36% | 18.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTG and FNGG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTG has higher volatility (31.48%) compared to FNGG (13.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTG dropped -80.11% vs FNGG's -91.33%.
On 1-year performance, FNGG leads with 24.13% vs -47.73% for PLTG. On fees, PLTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FNGG has been the lower-risk option at 13.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FNGG has performed better with a 24.13% return vs -47.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PLTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FNGG.
PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 40.36%, compared with 10.34% for FNGG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PLTG and 0.97% for FNGG.
FNGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTG and FNGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer