PLTD vs. ARKQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PLTD (Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares) and ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (-100%), while ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK. PLTD is passively managed, while ARKQ is actively managed. Over the past year, PLTD returned -23.62% vs 73.83% for ARKQ. At a correlation of -0.62, they often move in opposite directions. PLTD charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKQ.

Performance

PLTD vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTD achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly lower than ARKQ's 21.70% return.

PLTD

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -6.12%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 13.35%
• 1Y: -23.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARKQ

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 9.53%
• YTD: 21.70%
• 6M: 21.88%
• 1Y: 73.83%
• 3Y*: 39.06%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: 22.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTD vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares	13.62%	-70.53%	-5.12%
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	21.70%	48.81%	-0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTD and ARKQ is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024	-0.62

The correlation between PLTD and ARKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.62 to -0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PLTD vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTD

PLTD Risk / Return Rank: 5
PLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 6

ARKQ

ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 65
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTD vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTD	ARKQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	2.29	-2.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.39	2.82	-3.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.35	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	3.61	-4.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.78	10.92	-11.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTD vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTD Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTD and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTD	ARKQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46	2.29	-2.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.85	0.66	-1.52

Drawdowns

PLTD vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTD drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, which is greater than ARKQ's maximum drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTD and ARKQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTD	ARKQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.34%	-59.89%	-17.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.79%	-20.58%	-24.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.90%	-2.98%	-67.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.46%	-17.23%	-42.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.20%	6.79%	+23.41%

Volatility

PLTD vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) has a higher volatility of 17.33% compared to ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) at 10.40%. This indicates that PLTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTD	ARKQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.33%	10.40%	+6.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.97%	24.44%	+13.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.79%	32.48%	+19.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.64%	32.22%	+31.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.64%	29.83%	+33.81%

PLTD vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTD has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTD vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

PLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than ARKQ's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	0.22%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.80%	0.86%	0.00%	2.86%	1.54%	0.00%	0.98%
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares	3.25%	5.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTD and ARKQ in my portfolio?

PLTD and ARKQ have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTD or ARKQ?

PLTD has higher volatility (17.33%) compared to ARKQ (10.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTD dropped -77.34% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.

Which ETF is better, PLTD or ARKQ?

On 1-year performance, ARKQ leads with 73.83% vs -23.62% for PLTD. On fees, ARKQ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ARKQ has been the lower-risk option at 10.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTD or ARKQ?

Over the 1-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 73.83% return vs -23.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTD or ARKQ?

ARKQ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for PLTD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTD or ARKQ?

PLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.22% for ARKQ.

What is the main difference between PLTD and ARKQ?

PLTD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ARKQ is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for PLTD and 0.75% for ARKQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.