PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLSDX vs. FUMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLSDX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Short Duration Income (PLSDX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLSDX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly higher than FUMBX's -0.11% return.


PLSDX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.69%
6M
0.84%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
5.42%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
2.95%

FUMBX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
0.24%
1Y
2.69%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLSDX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLSDX
Pacific Funds Short Duration Income
0.69%5.93%5.44%6.68%-2.81%0.17%4.04%5.75%0.75%0.08%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
-0.11%5.83%3.25%4.47%-5.84%-1.38%4.22%4.19%1.47%-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PLSDX and FUMBX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.70

The correlation between PLSDX and FUMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLSDX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLSDX
PLSDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PLSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PLSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FUMBX
FUMBX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FUMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLSDX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Short Duration Income (PLSDX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLSDXFUMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.28

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

1.89

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.39

5.55

+12.84

PLSDX vs. FUMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLSDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the FUMBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLSDX and FUMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLSDX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLSDX drawdown since its inception was -7.79%, smaller than the maximum FUMBX drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLSDX and FUMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLSDXFUMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

-8.83%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.97%

-1.54%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.97%

-1.57%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.03%

-8.60%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-1.06%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.50%

-1.85%

+1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

0.52%

-0.31%

Volatility

PLSDX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacific Funds Short Duration Income (PLSDX) is 0.48%, while Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) has a volatility of 0.70%. This indicates that PLSDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLSDXFUMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

0.70%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.13%

1.56%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42%

2.08%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.83%

2.93%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.77%

2.49%

-0.72%

PLSDX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLSDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLSDX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison

PLSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than FUMBX's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.77%3.51%2.91%1.64%0.86%1.15%1.41%1.88%1.64%0.34%0.00%0.00%
PLSDX
Pacific Funds Short Duration Income
4.46%4.57%5.00%4.01%2.20%2.38%1.93%2.66%2.63%2.20%1.90%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLSDX and FUMBX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUMBX has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to PLSDX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLSDX dropped -7.79% vs FUMBX's -8.83%.

PLSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLSDX and FUMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer