PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLMIX vs. PYELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLMIX vs. PYELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund (PLMIX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLMIX achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than PYELX's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PLMIX has outperformed PYELX with an annualized return of 3.85%, while PYELX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.81% annualized return.


PLMIX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
3.75%
6M
5.44%
1Y
11.00%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
3.85%

PYELX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.70%
1Y
9.99%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
1.68%
10Y*
2.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLMIX vs. PYELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLMIX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund
3.75%17.29%0.57%9.01%-4.12%-2.76%2.28%6.21%-4.43%12.89%
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
0.59%19.79%-3.48%13.16%-11.28%-7.83%1.79%13.92%-8.16%15.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PLMIX and PYELX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.84

The correlation between PLMIX and PYELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLMIX vs. PYELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLMIX
PLMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PLMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PLMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PYELX
PYELX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PYELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYELX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PYELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYELX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLMIX vs. PYELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund (PLMIX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLMIXPYELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.32

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.44

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

4.82

+4.36

PLMIX vs. PYELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the PYELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLMIX and PYELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLMIXPYELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.59

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.03

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.08

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.04

+0.43

Drawdowns

PLMIX vs. PYELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLMIX drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, smaller than the maximum PYELX drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLMIX and PYELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLMIXPYELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.76%

-56.98%

+28.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-7.22%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.70%

-50.49%

+45.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.97%

-51.98%

+37.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.50%

-52.62%

+35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-3.18%

+2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-16.79%

+11.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

2.15%

-0.91%

Volatility

PLMIX vs. PYELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund (PLMIX) is 1.89%, while Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that PLMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLMIXPYELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

2.21%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.73%

5.64%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.74%

6.53%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

50.60%

-44.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.32%

36.35%

-30.03%

PLMIX vs. PYELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLMIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PYELX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLMIX vs. PYELX - Dividend Comparison

PLMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.42%, more than PYELX's 7.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLMIX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund
8.42%7.44%7.08%6.40%1.97%1.47%1.63%4.10%12.65%2.82%2.88%2.75%
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
7.23%7.32%7.08%5.38%5.93%5.36%4.69%5.46%6.67%6.15%5.44%5.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLMIX and PYELX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYELX has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to PLMIX (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLMIX dropped -28.76% vs PYELX's -56.98%.

PLMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLMIX and PYELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer