PLMIX vs. PYCEX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PLMIX (PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund) and PYCEX (Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PLMIX returned 3.77%/yr vs 3.87%/yr for PYCEX. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PLMIX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PYCEX.

Performance

PLMIX vs. PYCEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund (PLMIX) and Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLMIX achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly higher than PYCEX's 1.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PLMIX having a 3.77% annualized return and PYCEX not far ahead at 3.87%.

PLMIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.79%
• 6M: 2.54%
• YTD: 4.94%
• 1Y: 10.78%
• 3Y*: 8.29%
• 5Y*: 5.01%
• 10Y*: 3.77%
• ALL TIME*: 3.32%

PYCEX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.37%
• 6M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.90%
• 1Y: 5.45%
• 3Y*: 7.46%
• 5Y*: 2.50%
• 10Y*: 3.87%
• ALL TIME*: 4.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PLMIX PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PLMIX vs. PYCEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLMIX PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund	4.94%	17.29%	0.57%	9.01%	-4.12%	-2.76%	2.28%	6.21%	-4.43%	12.89%
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	1.90%	7.96%	7.90%	7.37%	-11.02%	0.80%	8.17%	11.90%	-3.33%	9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PLMIX and PYCEX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.37

The correlation between PLMIX and PYCEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PLMIX vs. PYCEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLMIX

PLMIX Risk / Return Rank: 76
PLMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PLMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PLMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PLMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
PLMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

PYCEX

PYCEX Risk / Return Rank: 87
PYCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PYCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PYCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PYCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
PYCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLMIX vs. PYCEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund (PLMIX) and Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLMIX	PYCEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	2.73	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	4.30	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.67	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	2.36	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	10.06	-1.01

PLMIX vs. PYCEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the PYCEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLMIX and PYCEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLMIX vs. PYCEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLMIX drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, which is greater than PYCEX's maximum drawdown of -20.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLMIX and PYCEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLMIX	PYCEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.76%	-20.12%	-8.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.70%	-2.37%	-2.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.70%	-3.15%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.95%	-20.12%	+6.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.50%	-20.12%	+2.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.54%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-2.96%	-2.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	0.55%	+0.70%

Volatility

PLMIX vs. PYCEX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund (PLMIX) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) at 0.48%. This indicates that PLMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYCEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLMIX	PYCEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	0.48%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.96%	1.63%	+3.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.78%	2.05%	+3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.03%	3.24%	+2.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.24%	3.57%	+2.67%

PLMIX vs. PYCEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLMIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PYCEX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLMIX vs. PYCEX - Dividend Comparison

PLMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, more than PYCEX's 6.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PLMIX PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund	7.95%	7.44%	7.08%	6.40%	1.97%	1.47%	1.63%	4.10%	12.65%	2.82%	2.88%	2.75%
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	6.44%	6.50%	6.21%	5.59%	4.92%	5.23%	4.00%	4.81%	5.13%	4.84%	4.18%	4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLMIX and PYCEX in my portfolio?

PLMIX and PYCEX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLMIX or PYCEX?

PLMIX has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to PYCEX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLMIX dropped -28.76% vs PYCEX's -20.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYCEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.