PLIDX vs. MCFIX
PLIDX (Aristotle Core Income Fund Class I-2) and MCFIX (Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PLIDX returned 0.74%/yr vs -0.74%/yr for MCFIX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PLIDX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for MCFIX.
Performance
PLIDX vs. MCFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLIDX achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly higher than MCFIX's -2.67% return.
PLIDX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- 2.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.74%
MCFIX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 1Y
- 0.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.14%
- 5Y*
- -0.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PLIDX vs. MCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLIDX Aristotle Core Income Fund Class I-2 | -0.60% | 7.26% | 2.77% | 8.35% | -12.15% | -0.21% | 8.79% | 6.41% |
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | -2.67% | 6.64% | 2.02% | 6.47% | -13.69% | -1.05% | 4.75% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLIDX and MCFIX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PLIDX and MCFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLIDX vs. MCFIX — Risk / Return Rank
PLIDX
MCFIX
PLIDX vs. MCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aristotle Core Income Fund Class I-2 (PLIDX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLIDX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.01 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 0.04 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | 0.09 | +3.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLIDX vs. MCFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLIDX drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum MCFIX drawdown of -21.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLIDX and MCFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLIDX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -21.68% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.54% | -4.08% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.97% | -5.90% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.05% | -18.72% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -7.57% | +5.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -8.50% | +5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 1.63% | -0.75% |
Volatility
PLIDX vs. MCFIX - Volatility Comparison
Aristotle Core Income Fund Class I-2 (PLIDX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) have volatilities of 1.08% and 1.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLIDX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 1.11% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 2.90% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.50% | 4.03% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 6.04% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 6.08% | -1.53% |
PLIDX vs. MCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLIDX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MCFIX's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLIDX vs. MCFIX - Dividend Comparison
PLIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than MCFIX's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.38% | 3.89% | 4.54% | 3.68% | 3.31% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLIDX Aristotle Core Income Fund Class I-2 | 4.77% | 4.70% | 4.86% | 4.27% | 3.31% | 4.28% | 3.03% | 3.07% | 3.50% | 2.90% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLIDX and MCFIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCFIX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to PLIDX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLIDX dropped -17.05% vs MCFIX's -21.68%.
PLIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLIDX and MCFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer