PLFMX vs. PLTNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX).
PLFMX is a passively managed fund by Principal that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2000. PLTNX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014.
Performance
PLFMX vs. PLTNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLFMX vs. PLTNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLFMX Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund | -7.21% | 17.10% | 26.06% | 25.27% | -18.67% | 27.57% | 17.46% | 30.58% | -5.14% | 20.96% |
PLTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund | -4.53% | 19.89% | 17.25% | 20.33% | -18.49% | 19.70% | 15.78% | 26.17% | -9.84% | 21.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLFMX achieves a -7.21% return, which is significantly lower than PLTNX's -4.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PLFMX has outperformed PLTNX with an annualized return of 13.08%, while PLTNX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.48% annualized return.
PLFMX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.72%
- YTD
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -4.88%
- 1Y
- 13.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
PLTNX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -8.15%
- YTD
- -4.53%
- 6M
- -1.63%
- 1Y
- 16.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLFMX vs. PLTNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLFMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTNX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLFMX vs. PLTNX — Risk / Return Rank
PLFMX
PLTNX
PLFMX vs. PLTNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLFMX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 1.02 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.54 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 1.22 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.83 | 6.15 | -1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLFMX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 1.02 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.54 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.67 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.61 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLFMX and PLTNX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PLFMX vs. PLTNX - Dividend Comparison
PLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than PLTNX's 4.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLFMX Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund | 2.59% | 2.41% | 3.77% | 3.62% | 2.28% | 13.02% | 7.02% | 3.28% | 6.80% | 6.44% | 2.66% | 2.07% |
PLTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund | 4.81% | 4.59% | 4.40% | 2.84% | 9.11% | 4.23% | 3.11% | 3.47% | 4.68% | 2.21% | 1.99% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
PLFMX vs. PLTNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLFMX drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, which is greater than PLTNX's maximum drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFMX and PLTNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLFMX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.62% | -32.71% | -22.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -11.90% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.91% | -25.48% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | -32.71% | -1.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.00% | -8.66% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -4.83% | -5.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.36% | +0.14% |
Volatility
PLFMX vs. PLTNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) is 4.25%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that PLFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLFMX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 5.01% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 9.07% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.88% | 16.20% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 15.39% | +1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 15.77% | +1.68% |