PLFMX vs. BSPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G (BSPGX).
PLFMX is a passively managed fund by Principal that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2000. BSPGX is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jul 1, 2019. Both PLFMX and BSPGX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PLFMX vs. BSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLFMX vs. BSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLFMX Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund | -7.21% | 17.10% | 26.06% | 25.27% | -18.67% | 27.57% | 17.46% | 9.41% |
BSPGX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G | -7.06% | 17.85% | 24.96% | 26.27% | -18.12% | 28.66% | 19.16% | 11.06% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PLFMX having a -7.21% return and BSPGX slightly higher at -7.06%.
PLFMX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.72%
- YTD
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -4.88%
- 1Y
- 13.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
BSPGX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -7.06%
- 6M
- -4.62%
- 1Y
- 14.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLFMX vs. BSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLFMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than BSPGX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLFMX vs. BSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
PLFMX
BSPGX
PLFMX vs. BSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G (BSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLFMX | BSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.84 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 1.06 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.83 | 5.14 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLFMX | BSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.84 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.68 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.69 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLFMX and BSPGX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PLFMX vs. BSPGX - Dividend Comparison
PLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than BSPGX's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLFMX Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund | 2.59% | 2.41% | 3.77% | 3.62% | 2.28% | 13.02% | 7.02% | 3.28% | 6.80% | 6.44% | 2.66% | 2.07% |
BSPGX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G | 1.60% | 1.74% | 1.43% | 1.52% | 2.04% | 1.83% | 2.09% | 2.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PLFMX vs. BSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLFMX drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, which is greater than BSPGX's maximum drawdown of -33.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFMX and BSPGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLFMX | BSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.62% | -33.74% | -21.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -12.11% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.91% | -24.50% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.00% | -8.90% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -5.19% | -4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.49% | +0.01% |
Volatility
PLFMX vs. BSPGX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G (BSPGX) have volatilities of 4.25% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLFMX | BSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 4.24% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 9.08% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.88% | 18.06% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 16.85% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 20.15% | -2.70% |