PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLFLX vs. RPIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLFLX vs. RPIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aristotle Floating Rate Income Fund Class A (PLFLX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLFLX achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than RPIFX's 1.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PLFLX having a 4.81% annualized return and RPIFX not far ahead at 4.82%.


PLFLX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.88%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
4.81%

RPIFX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.98%
1Y
5.72%
3Y*
7.81%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
4.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLFLX vs. RPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLFLX
Aristotle Floating Rate Income Fund Class A
1.18%6.33%8.03%13.70%-2.35%4.16%0.95%7.91%0.14%4.02%
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
1.37%6.71%8.47%10.13%-1.96%4.67%2.42%8.82%0.39%3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PLFLX and RPIFX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2011

0.58

The correlation between PLFLX and RPIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLFLX vs. RPIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLFLX
PLFLX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PLFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PLFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

RPIFX
RPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLFLX vs. RPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aristotle Floating Rate Income Fund Class A (PLFLX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLFLXRPIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.93

1.93

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.99

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.01

14.77

-2.76

PLFLX vs. RPIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLFLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the RPIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLFLX and RPIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLFLXRPIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.43

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.01

1.93

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.29

1.27

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

1.29

+0.19

Drawdowns

PLFLX vs. RPIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLFLX drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, smaller than the maximum RPIFX drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFLX and RPIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLFLXRPIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-25.10%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

-1.44%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.09%

-2.28%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.45%

-5.90%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.80%

-19.67%

+0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-1.34%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.39%

+0.09%

Volatility

PLFLX vs. RPIFX - Volatility Comparison

Aristotle Floating Rate Income Fund Class A (PLFLX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) have volatilities of 0.59% and 0.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLFLXRPIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

0.57%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.91%

1.73%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50%

2.37%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

2.76%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.74%

3.80%

-0.06%

PLFLX vs. RPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLFLX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than RPIFX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLFLX vs. RPIFX - Dividend Comparison

PLFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, less than RPIFX's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLFLX
Aristotle Floating Rate Income Fund Class A
6.75%6.86%8.14%8.61%4.16%3.35%3.29%4.94%4.77%4.16%3.92%4.21%
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
7.00%7.22%7.77%6.53%4.12%3.94%4.29%5.12%5.16%4.32%4.31%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLFLX and RPIFX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLFLX has higher volatility (0.59%) compared to RPIFX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLFLX dropped -18.80% vs RPIFX's -25.10%.

RPIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLFLX and RPIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer