PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLFLX vs. RCRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLFLX vs. RCRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aristotle Floating Rate Income Fund Class A (PLFLX) and RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLFLX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than RCRIX's 2.14% return.


PLFLX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.55%
1Y
5.46%
3Y*
7.64%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
4.78%

RCRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.20%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
7.41%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLFLX vs. RCRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLFLX
Aristotle Floating Rate Income Fund Class A
0.85%6.33%8.03%13.70%-2.35%4.16%0.95%7.91%0.14%1.93%
RCRIX
RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund
2.14%5.56%10.01%9.85%-0.72%2.81%-8.51%4.46%59.17%3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PLFLX and RCRIX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLFLX vs. RCRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLFLX
PLFLX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PLFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PLFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

RCRIX
RCRIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
RCRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
RCRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLFLX vs. RCRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aristotle Floating Rate Income Fund Class A (PLFLX) and RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLFLXRCRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-14.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

8.21

-6.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

26.83

-23.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

167.21

-156.00

PLFLX vs. RCRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLFLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is lower than the RCRIX Sharpe Ratio of 6.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLFLX and RCRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLFLX vs. RCRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLFLX drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, smaller than the maximum RCRIX drawdown of -30.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFLX and RCRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLFLXRCRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-30.00%

+11.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

-0.19%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.09%

-1.93%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.45%

-3.75%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-2.99%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

0.03%

+0.46%

Volatility

PLFLX vs. RCRIX - Volatility Comparison

Aristotle Floating Rate Income Fund Class A (PLFLX) has a higher volatility of 0.64% compared to RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) at 0.21%. This indicates that PLFLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLFLXRCRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.21%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.94%

0.60%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52%

0.77%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

1.60%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.74%

7.91%

-4.17%

PLFLX vs. RCRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLFLX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than RCRIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLFLX vs. RCRIX - Dividend Comparison

PLFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than RCRIX's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLFLX
Aristotle Floating Rate Income Fund Class A
6.77%6.86%8.14%8.61%4.16%3.35%3.29%4.94%4.77%4.16%3.92%4.21%
RCRIX
RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund
4.94%5.30%6.85%7.90%3.80%2.34%3.16%3.36%49.16%3.64%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLFLX and RCRIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLFLX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to RCRIX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLFLX dropped -18.80% vs RCRIX's -30.00%.

RCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.62 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLFLX and RCRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer