PLDTX vs. TNSHX
PLDTX (PIMCO Low Duration II Fund) and TNSHX (TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, PLDTX returned 1.76%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for TNSHX. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PLDTX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for TNSHX.
Performance
PLDTX vs. TNSHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLDTX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than TNSHX's 0.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PLDTX having a 1.76% annualized return and TNSHX not far ahead at 1.79%.
PLDTX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 2.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- 1.56%
- 10Y*
- 1.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.62%
TNSHX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 2.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PLDTX vs. TNSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLDTX PIMCO Low Duration II Fund | 0.10% | 5.47% | 4.55% | 4.21% | -5.14% | -1.03% | 3.44% | 3.83% | 0.63% | 1.66% |
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 0.52% | 5.31% | 4.03% | 4.05% | -3.96% | -0.57% | 3.26% | 4.05% | 1.31% | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLDTX and TNSHX is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.74 |
The correlation between PLDTX and TNSHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLDTX vs. TNSHX — Risk / Return Rank
PLDTX
TNSHX
PLDTX vs. TNSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Low Duration II Fund (PLDTX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLDTX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.58 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | 9.51 | -2.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLDTX vs. TNSHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLDTX drawdown since its inception was -7.60%, which is greater than TNSHX's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLDTX and TNSHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLDTX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -5.99% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.49% | -1.13% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.49% | -1.13% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.42% | -5.99% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.60% | -5.99% | -1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.31% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -0.88% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 0.31% | +0.11% |
Volatility
PLDTX vs. TNSHX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Low Duration II Fund (PLDTX) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) at 0.40%. This indicates that PLDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLDTX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | 0.40% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.63% | 1.43% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09% | 1.86% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.42% | 2.26% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.97% | 1.82% | +0.15% |
PLDTX vs. TNSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLDTX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TNSHX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLDTX vs. TNSHX - Dividend Comparison
PLDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than TNSHX's 3.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLDTX PIMCO Low Duration II Fund | 3.50% | 3.79% | 3.99% | 3.55% | 1.28% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.72% | 2.18% | 1.45% | 1.76% | 1.60% |
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 3.73% | 4.22% | 3.94% | 2.68% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.81% | 2.45% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLDTX and TNSHX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLDTX has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to TNSHX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLDTX dropped -7.60% vs TNSHX's -5.99%.
TNSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLDTX and TNSHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer