PLD vs. LMP.L
PLD (Prologis, Inc.) and LMP.L (LondonMetric Property plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — PLD in REIT - Industrial, LMP.L in REIT - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, PLD returned 14.79%/yr vs 6.16%/yr for LMP.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLD vs. LMP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PLD is traded in USD, while LMP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LMP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLD achieves a 17.45% return, which is significantly higher than LMP.L's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PLD has outperformed LMP.L with an annualized return of 14.79%, while LMP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.16% annualized return.
PLD
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 17.45%
- 6M
- 16.07%
- 1Y
- 43.46%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
LMP.L
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- -1.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.39%
- 10Y*
- 6.16%
PLD vs. LMP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 17.45% | 25.08% | -18.12% | 21.58% | -31.33% | 72.33% | 14.74% | 55.87% | -6.25% | 25.94% |
LMP.L LondonMetric Property plc | 0.72% | 20.96% | -2.09% | 23.40% | -43.33% | 27.16% | 3.62% | 47.25% | -7.83% | 37.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLD and LMP.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2013 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
PLD:
$142.43B
LMP.L:
£4.32B
PLD:
$3.88
LMP.L:
£0.28
PLD:
38.30
LMP.L:
6.55
PLD:
15.91
LMP.L:
4.86
PLD:
2.67
LMP.L:
0.92
PLD:
$8.95B
LMP.L:
£867.40M
PLD:
$3.88B
LMP.L:
£854.10M
PLD:
$7.71B
LMP.L:
£828.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLD vs. LMP.L — Risk / Return Rank
PLD
LMP.L
PLD vs. LMP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prologis, Inc. (PLD) and LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLD | LMP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.99 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.39 | -0.20 | +4.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.61 | -0.37 | +14.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLD vs. LMP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLD drawdown since its inception was -84.70%, which is greater than LMP.L's maximum drawdown of -53.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLD and LMP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLD | LMP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.70% | -53.28% | -31.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -16.83% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.37% | -22.97% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.30% | -53.28% | +9.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.30% | -53.28% | +9.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -16.91% | +14.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.36% | -13.56% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 9.08% | -6.19% |
Volatility
PLD vs. LMP.L - Volatility Comparison
Prologis, Inc. (PLD) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) at 5.91%. This indicates that PLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLD | LMP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 5.91% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.49% | 15.47% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.46% | 19.56% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 27.63% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.00% | 27.79% | -0.79% |
Dividends
PLD vs. LMP.L - Dividend Comparison
PLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than LMP.L's 6.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMP.L LondonMetric Property plc | 6.71% | 6.54% | 6.16% | 5.07% | 5.48% | 3.12% | 3.71% | 3.55% | 4.60% | 4.09% | 4.73% | 3.35% |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 2.76% | 3.16% | 3.63% | 2.61% | 2.80% | 1.50% | 2.33% | 2.38% | 3.27% | 2.73% | 3.18% | 3.54% |
Financials
PLD vs. LMP.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prologis, Inc. and LondonMetric Property plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PLD vs. LMP.L - Profitability Comparison
PLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 232.54M and revenue of 2.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.
LMP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported a gross profit of 233.80M and revenue of 238.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.9%.
PLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported an operating income of 827.03M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
LMP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported an operating income of 217.10M and revenue of 238.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 90.9%.
PLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a net income of 981.98M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in a net margin of 42.7%.
LMP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported a net income of 165.40M and revenue of 238.90M, resulting in a net margin of 69.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLD and LMP.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PLD and LMP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer