PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLAY vs. CAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLAY vs. CAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLAY achieves a -33.13% return, which is significantly lower than CAT's 43.10% return. Over the past 10 years, PLAY has underperformed CAT with an annualized return of -12.45%, while CAT has yielded a comparatively higher 28.72% annualized return.


PLAY

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.81%
6M
-42.25%
YTD
-33.13%
1Y
-61.42%
3Y*
-37.97%
5Y*
-20.10%
10Y*
-12.45%
ALL TIME*
-3.57%

CAT

1D
0.70%
1M
-15.28%
6M
24.42%
YTD
43.10%
1Y
91.78%
3Y*
43.33%
5Y*
33.84%
10Y*
28.72%
ALL TIME*
10.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.66B$2.67B$2.93B
$13.16M$13.93M$19.34M

PLAY vs. CAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
-33.13%-44.47%-45.79%51.95%-7.71%27.91%-24.97%-8.87%-18.76%-2.01%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
43.10%60.30%24.66%25.95%18.60%15.95%26.97%19.51%-17.56%75.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PLAY and CAT is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between PLAY and CAT has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLAY:

$377.11M

CAT:

$375.33B

EPS

PLAY:

-$1.86

CAT:

$20.10

PS Ratio

PLAY:

0.18

CAT:

5.40

PB Ratio

PLAY:

0.18

CAT:

20.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLAY:

$2.09B

CAT:

$70.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLAY:

$1.32B

CAT:

$23.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

PLAY:

$350.60M

CAT:

$15.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLAY vs. CAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLAY
PLAY Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PLAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLAY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PLAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLAY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

CAT
CAT Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLAY vs. CAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLAYCATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.37

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

3.34

-4.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

13.81

-15.17

PLAY vs. CAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the CAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLAY and CAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLAY vs. CAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLAY drawdown since its inception was -93.18%, which is greater than CAT's maximum drawdown of -73.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLAY and CAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLAYCATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.18%

-73.43%

-19.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.05%

-26.36%

-39.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.03%

-34.05%

-51.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.03%

-34.05%

-51.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.18%

-43.36%

-49.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.82%

-23.34%

-61.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.81%

-19.71%

-19.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.03%

6.41%

+41.62%

Volatility

PLAY vs. CAT - Volatility Comparison

Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) has a higher volatility of 19.72% compared to Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) at 11.37%. This indicates that PLAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLAYCATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.72%

11.37%

+8.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.59%

31.53%

+22.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.90%

39.11%

+31.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.08%

31.62%

+28.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.03%

31.31%

+39.72%

Dividends

PLAY vs. CAT - Dividend Comparison

PLAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
0.76%1.02%1.49%1.69%1.93%2.07%2.26%2.56%2.58%1.97%3.32%4.33%
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.53%1.15%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PLAY vs. CAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. and Caterpillar Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PLAY vs. CAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. and Caterpillar Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PLAY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 559.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.11B and revenue of 17.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.

PLAY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. reported an operating income of 46.90M and revenue of 559.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

CAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported an operating income of 3.09B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

PLAY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. reported a net income of 5.70M and revenue of 559.20M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.

CAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLAY and CAT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLAY has higher volatility (19.72%) compared to CAT (11.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLAY dropped -93.18% vs CAT's -73.43%.

CAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLAY and CAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer