PL vs. ION
PL (Planet Labs PBC) is a stock, while ION (Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net. Over the past 3 years, PL returned 87.88%/yr vs 7.83%/yr for ION. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PL vs. ION - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PL achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly higher than ION's -12.05% return.
PL
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -21.54%
- 6M
- -23.04%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 226.22%
- 3Y*
- 87.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.82%
ION
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -19.28%
- 6M
- -23.00%
- YTD
- -12.05%
- 1Y
- 45.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.98%
PL vs. ION - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL Planet Labs PBC | 12.32% | 388.12% | 63.56% | -43.22% | -19.59% |
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | -12.05% | 108.37% | -20.02% | -14.10% | -8.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PL and ION is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PL vs. ION — Risk / Return Rank
PL
ION
PL vs. ION - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Labs PBC (PL) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PL | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.20 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 1.37 | +2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 4.26 | +7.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PL vs. ION - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PL drawdown since its inception was -85.11%, which is greater than ION's maximum drawdown of -52.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL and ION.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PL | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.11% | -52.08% | -33.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.02% | -33.66% | -23.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.02% | -45.11% | -11.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.91% | -33.66% | -23.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.19% | -23.68% | -31.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.24% | 10.81% | +8.43% |
Volatility
PL vs. ION - Volatility Comparison
Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a higher volatility of 24.26% compared to Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) at 9.58%. This indicates that PL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ION based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PL | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.26% | 9.58% | +14.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.92% | 31.29% | +42.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.22% | 40.13% | +64.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.87% | 31.64% | +53.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.87% | 31.64% | +53.23% |
Dividends
PL vs. ION - Dividend Comparison
PL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 1.69% | 1.63% | 1.74% | 2.23% | 0.13% |
PL Planet Labs PBC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PL and ION have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PL has higher volatility (24.26%) compared to ION (9.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PL dropped -85.11% vs ION's -52.08%.
PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PL and ION
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer