PL vs. ION
PL (Planet Labs PBC) is a stock, while ION (Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net. Over the past 3 years, PL returned 117.50%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for ION. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PL vs. ION - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PL achieves a 68.00% return, which is significantly higher than ION's -1.19% return.
PL
- 1D
- 5.91%
- 1M
- -35.22%
- YTD
- 68.00%
- 6M
- 67.83%
- 1Y
- 443.11%
- 3Y*
- 117.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ION
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -15.33%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -1.36%
- 1Y
- 78.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PL vs. ION - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL Planet Labs PBC | 68.00% | 388.12% | 63.56% | -43.22% | -19.59% |
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | -1.19% | 108.37% | -20.02% | -14.10% | -8.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PL and ION is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PL vs. ION — Risk / Return Rank
PL
ION
PL vs. ION - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Labs PBC (PL) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PL | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.31 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.15 | 2.93 | +6.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.19 | 9.15 | +19.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PL vs. ION - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PL drawdown since its inception was -85.11%, which is greater than ION's maximum drawdown of -52.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL and ION.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PL | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.11% | -52.08% | -33.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.83% | -26.85% | -21.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.17% | -46.47% | -8.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.54% | -25.47% | -10.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.27% | -23.60% | -31.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.82% | 8.57% | +7.25% |
Volatility
PL vs. ION - Volatility Comparison
Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a higher volatility of 41.66% compared to Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) at 13.79%. This indicates that PL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ION based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PL | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.66% | 13.79% | +27.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.65% | 32.01% | +41.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.54% | 39.57% | +63.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.01% | 31.57% | +53.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.01% | 31.57% | +53.44% |
Dividends
PL vs. ION - Dividend Comparison
PL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 1.50% | 1.63% | 1.74% | 2.23% | 0.13% |
PL Planet Labs PBC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PL and ION have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PL has higher volatility (41.66%) compared to ION (13.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PL dropped -85.11% vs ION's -52.08%.
PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PL and ION
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer