PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKW vs. IWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKW vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 15.78% return. Over the past 10 years, PKW has outperformed IWS with an annualized return of 13.54%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.56% annualized return.


PKW

1D
0.23%
1M
2.07%
YTD
3.81%
6M
2.73%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
13.54%

IWS

1D
-1.08%
1M
2.64%
YTD
15.78%
6M
14.47%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKW vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
3.81%17.92%17.33%17.24%-10.21%32.62%8.41%34.09%-10.53%17.75%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
15.78%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PKW and IWS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2006

0.91

The correlation between PKW and IWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

PKW vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PKW
IWS

Financial Services

28.4%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
8.5%

Industrials

14.0%
16.2%

Technology

12.3%
18.7%

Healthcare

10.2%
7.6%

Energy

5.4%
7.4%

Communication Services

4.1%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.7%

Utilities

2.2%
6.6%

Basic Materials

1.0%
5.3%

Real Estate

0.3%
8.3%

Financial Services

PKW
28.4%
IWS
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PKW
19.0%
IWS
8.5%

Industrials

PKW
14.0%
IWS
16.2%

Technology

PKW
12.3%
IWS
18.7%

Healthcare

PKW
10.2%
IWS
7.6%

Energy

PKW
5.4%
IWS
7.4%

Communication Services

PKW
4.1%
IWS
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

PKW
3.2%
IWS
4.7%

Utilities

PKW
2.2%
IWS
6.6%

Basic Materials

PKW
1.0%
IWS
5.3%

Real Estate

PKW
0.3%
IWS
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKW vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKW
PKW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKW Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKW Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKW vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PKWIWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.57

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.50

13.39

-6.89

PKW vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the IWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKW and IWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PKW vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and IWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKWIWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.59%

-62.40%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-7.53%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-20.57%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

-21.23%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-43.83%

+2.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-1.24%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-8.00%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.00%

+0.50%

Volatility

PKW vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) is 3.39%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that PKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKWIWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

4.37%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

10.12%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.29%

13.57%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

17.33%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

19.35%

+0.40%

PKW vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKW vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than IWS's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.34%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
0.81%0.99%0.86%1.17%1.22%0.72%1.48%1.30%1.30%0.65%1.59%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKW and IWS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWS has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to PKW (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKW dropped -54.59% vs IWS's -62.40%.

On 10-year performance, PKW leads with 13.54% vs 10.56% for IWS. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, PKW has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PKW has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.

IWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.81% for PKW.

PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.23% for IWS.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKW and IWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer