PKW vs. DIV
PKW (Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - PKW tracks the NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index while DIV tracks the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PKW returned 13.54%/yr vs 4.14%/yr for DIV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PKW charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
PKW vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, PKW has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 13.54%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.14% annualized return.
PKW
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 16.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
DIV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
PKW vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKW Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF | 3.81% | 17.92% | 17.33% | 17.24% | -10.21% | 32.62% | 8.41% | 34.09% | -10.53% | 17.75% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 13.39% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKW and DIV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.72 |
The correlation between PKW and DIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PKW vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PKW
DIV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
-
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
PKW
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
PKW
DIV
Industrials
PKW
DIV
Technology
PKW
DIV
-
Healthcare
PKW
DIV
Energy
PKW
DIV
Communication Services
PKW
DIV
Consumer Defensive
PKW
DIV
Utilities
PKW
DIV
Basic Materials
PKW
DIV
Real Estate
PKW
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKW vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
PKW
DIV
PKW vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKW | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.98 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 8.09 | -1.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKW vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, roughly equal to the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKW | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.59% | -52.74% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | -5.23% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -12.33% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.51% | -21.14% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.93% | -52.74% | +11.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -1.67% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -7.01% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 1.92% | +0.58% |
Volatility
PKW vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) is 3.39%, while Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that PKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKW | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 3.68% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 7.54% | +2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 10.64% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 13.69% | +3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 18.00% | +1.75% |
PKW vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PKW vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than DIV's 6.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.77% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
PKW Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF | 0.81% | 0.99% | 0.86% | 1.17% | 1.22% | 0.72% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.30% | 0.65% | 1.59% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKW and DIV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIV has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to PKW (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKW dropped -54.59% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, PKW leads with 13.54% vs 4.14% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PKW has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PKW has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 0.81% for PKW.
PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.45% for DIV.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKW and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer