PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKG vs. RYN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PKG vs. RYN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) and Rayonier Inc. (RYN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKG achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than RYN's -2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, PKG has outperformed RYN with an annualized return of 15.81%, while RYN has yielded a comparatively lower 2.40% annualized return.


PKG

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.90%
YTD
9.44%
6M
14.72%
1Y
18.46%
3Y*
23.86%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*
15.81%

RYN

1D
0.14%
1M
1.55%
YTD
-2.07%
6M
0.86%
1Y
-4.50%
3Y*
-4.86%
5Y*
-5.61%
10Y*
2.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKG vs. RYN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
9.44%-6.08%41.70%31.90%-2.62%1.55%27.20%38.35%-28.85%45.51%
RYN
Rayonier Inc.
-2.07%-12.01%-13.30%5.76%-15.80%41.56%-6.47%22.65%-9.70%23.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PKG and RYN is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2000

0.46

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PKG:

$19.99B

RYN:

$5.36B

EPS

PKG:

$8.25

RYN:

$2.11

PE Ratio

PKG:

27.18

RYN:

9.91

PEG Ratio

PKG:

35.82

RYN:

0.77

PS Ratio

PKG:

2.18

RYN:

5.65

PB Ratio

PKG:

4.36

RYN:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

PKG:

$9.22B

RYN:

$678.37M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PKG:

$1.89B

RYN:

$185.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

PKG:

$1.84B

RYN:

$141.97M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKG vs. RYN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKG
PKG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

RYN
RYN Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
RYN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYN Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
RYN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYN Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKG vs. RYN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) and Rayonier Inc. (RYN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PKGRYNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.99

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

-0.18

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.39

-0.33

+2.72

PKG vs. RYN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKG Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the RYN Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKG and RYN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PKGRYNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

-0.17

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

-0.22

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.08

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.26

+0.22

Drawdowns

PKG vs. RYN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKG drawdown since its inception was -66.88%, which is greater than RYN's maximum drawdown of -53.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKG and RYN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKGRYNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.88%

-53.16%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.21%

-24.61%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.43%

-33.93%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.78%

-45.30%

+13.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.18%

-49.84%

+11.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.36%

-41.29%

+32.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-15.46%

+3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.74%

13.85%

-6.11%

Volatility

PKG vs. RYN - Volatility Comparison

Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Rayonier Inc. (RYN) at 6.64%. This indicates that PKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKGRYNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

6.64%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.88%

18.32%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.89%

26.26%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.34%

25.59%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

28.54%

-1.21%

Dividends

PKG vs. RYN - Dividend Comparison

PKG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than RYN's 6.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
2.23%2.42%2.22%3.07%3.71%2.94%2.44%2.82%3.59%2.09%2.78%3.49%
RYN
Rayonier Inc.
6.82%6.65%12.03%4.01%3.41%2.68%3.68%3.30%3.83%3.16%3.76%4.50%

Financials

PKG vs. RYN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Packaging Corporation of America and Rayonier Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
2.37B
276.80M
(PKG) Total Revenue
(RYN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PKG vs. RYN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Packaging Corporation of America and Rayonier Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
19.1%
16.8%
Portfolio components
PKG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported a gross profit of 452.90M and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

RYN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rayonier Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.50M and revenue of 276.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.8%.

PKG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported an operating income of 272.60M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

RYN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rayonier Inc. reported an operating income of -45.70M and revenue of 276.80M, resulting in an operating margin of -16.5%.

PKG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported a net income of 170.90M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

RYN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rayonier Inc. reported a net income of -91.30M and revenue of 276.80M, resulting in a net margin of -33.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PKG and RYN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKG has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to RYN (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKG dropped -66.88% vs RYN's -53.16%.

PKG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKG and RYN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer