PKG vs. LW
PKG (Packaging Corporation of America) and LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. PKG operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while LW operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, PKG returned 15.02%/yr vs -2.87%/yr for LW. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PKG vs. LW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKG achieves a 20.70% return, which is significantly lower than LW's 27.62% return.
PKG
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- YTD
- 20.70%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.20%
- 5Y*
- 15.02%
- 10Y*
- 16.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.24%
LW
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 14.46%
- 6M
- 15.43%
- YTD
- 27.62%
- 1Y
- -3.95%
- 3Y*
- -18.33%
- 5Y*
- -2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $137.21M | $98.53M | $77.02M | |
| $229.85M | $176.84M | $158.43M |
PKG vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKG Packaging Corporation of America | 20.70% | -6.08% | 41.70% | 31.90% | -2.62% | 1.55% | 27.20% | 38.35% | -28.85% | 45.51% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 27.62% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 22.32% | 42.89% | -18.40% | -7.23% | 18.27% | 31.81% | 51.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKG and LW is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2016 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
PKG:
$21.90B
LW:
$7.22B
PKG:
$8.25
LW:
$2.08
PKG:
29.78
LW:
25.22
PKG:
39.24
LW:
0.32
PKG:
2.39
LW:
1.11
PKG:
4.77
LW:
3.97
PKG:
$9.22B
LW:
$6.61B
PKG:
$1.89B
LW:
$1.36B
PKG:
$1.84B
LW:
$980.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKG vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank
PKG
LW
PKG vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKG | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.02 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | -0.13 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | -0.20 | +4.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKG vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKG drawdown since its inception was -66.88%, roughly equal to the maximum LW drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKG and LW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKG | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.88% | -64.56% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.21% | -41.37% | +24.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.43% | -63.13% | +34.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.78% | -64.56% | +32.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -51.18% | +47.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -21.79% | +10.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | 25.72% | -17.85% |
Volatility
PKG vs. LW - Volatility Comparison
Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) has a higher volatility of 10.92% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) at 10.03%. This indicates that PKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKG | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.92% | 10.03% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.14% | 25.59% | -3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.53% | 41.93% | -13.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.85% | 37.63% | -11.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.42% | 35.87% | -8.45% |
Dividends
PKG vs. LW - Dividend Comparison
PKG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than LW's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 2.15% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PKG Packaging Corporation of America | 2.14% | 2.42% | 2.22% | 3.07% | 3.71% | 2.94% | 2.44% | 2.82% | 3.59% | 2.09% | 2.78% | 3.49% |
Financials
PKG vs. LW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Packaging Corporation of America and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PKG vs. LW - Profitability Comparison
PKG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported a gross profit of 452.90M and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.
LW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 361.40M and revenue of 1.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.
PKG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported an operating income of 272.60M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
LW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 168.80M and revenue of 1.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.
PKG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported a net income of 170.90M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
LW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 109.60M and revenue of 1.77B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PKG and LW have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PKG has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to LW (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKG dropped -66.88% vs LW's -64.56%.
PKG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKG and LW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer