PJUL vs. KAUG
PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) and KAUG (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. PJUL is passively managed, while KAUG is actively managed. Over the past year, PJUL returned 15.32% vs 15.76% for KAUG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
PJUL vs. KAUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJUL achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than KAUG's 7.07% return.
PJUL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
KAUG
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 15.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL vs. KAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.74% | 12.78% | 5.67% |
KAUG Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF | 7.07% | 5.52% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJUL and KAUG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024 | 0.77 |
The correlation between PJUL and KAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJUL vs. KAUG — Risk / Return Rank
PJUL
KAUG
PJUL vs. KAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJUL | KAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.38 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 4.02 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.24 | 14.54 | +8.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJUL | KAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 1.98 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.76 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
PJUL vs. KAUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJUL drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, which is greater than KAUG's maximum drawdown of -15.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUL and KAUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJUL | KAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -15.66% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -3.94% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -2.85% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 1.09% | -0.43% |
Volatility
PJUL vs. KAUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) is 0.42%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) has a volatility of 0.98%. This indicates that PJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJUL | KAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 0.98% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.89% | 5.15% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.66% | 8.02% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.60% | 11.21% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.03% | 11.21% | -1.18% |
PJUL vs. KAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PJUL and KAUG have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
PJUL vs. KAUG - Dividend Comparison
Neither PJUL nor KAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KAUG Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJUL and KAUG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KAUG has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to PJUL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUL dropped -18.17% vs KAUG's -15.66%.
On 1-year performance, KAUG leads with 15.76% vs 15.32% for PJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KAUG has performed better with a 15.76% return vs 15.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PJUL and KAUG have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
PJUL and KAUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJUL and KAUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer