PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJUL vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJUL vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJUL achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than BUFF's 5.42% return.


PJUL

1D
0.10%
1M
1.44%
YTD
4.74%
6M
5.40%
1Y
15.32%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*

BUFF

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.90%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJUL vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
4.74%12.78%13.76%19.87%-2.08%7.20%7.51%12.47%-4.45%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
5.42%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%8.37%-12.08%32.32%-4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PJUL and BUFF is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018

0.81

The correlation between PJUL and BUFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PJUL vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PJUL
BUFF

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

PJUL
36.2%
BUFF
36.2%

Financial Services

PJUL
11.9%
BUFF
11.9%

Communication Services

PJUL
10.9%
BUFF
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PJUL
10.1%
BUFF
10.1%

Healthcare

PJUL
8.4%
BUFF
8.4%

Industrials

PJUL
8.1%
BUFF
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

PJUL
4.9%
BUFF
4.9%

Energy

PJUL
3.5%
BUFF
3.5%

Utilities

PJUL
2.3%
BUFF
2.3%

Real Estate

PJUL
1.9%
BUFF
1.9%

Basic Materials

PJUL
1.8%
BUFF
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJUL vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJUL vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJULBUFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.58

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

4.02

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.24

21.50

+1.74

PJUL vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJUL and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJULBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.80

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

1.04

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.49

+0.40

Drawdowns

PJUL vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJUL drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUL and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJULBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.17%

-46.23%

+28.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-3.58%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.69%

-10.24%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.69%

-10.24%

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-6.18%

+4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.67%

-0.01%

Volatility

PJUL vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) is 0.42%, while Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that PJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJULBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

1.02%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.89%

3.83%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.66%

5.15%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.60%

8.41%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.03%

17.67%

-7.64%

PJUL vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJUL vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither PJUL nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJUL and BUFF have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFF has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to PJUL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUL dropped -18.17% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 5-year performance, PJUL leads with 10.49% vs 8.71% for BUFF. On fees, PJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PJUL has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

PJUL and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PJUL and 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJUL and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer