PJUL vs. APXM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) and APXM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. PJUL is passively managed, while APXM is actively managed. Over the past year, PJUL returned 14.31% vs 4.86% for APXM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for APXM.

Performance

PJUL vs. APXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJUL achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than APXM's 1.82% return.

PJUL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 4.60%
• 1Y: 14.31%
• 3Y*: 13.24%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: —

APXM

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 4.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJUL vs. APXM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July	4.80%	19.30%
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April	1.82%	5.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PJUL and APXM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025	0.70

The correlation between PJUL and APXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PJUL vs. APXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJUL

PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 90
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 93

APXM

APXM Risk / Return Rank: 97
APXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
APXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APXM Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
APXM Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJUL vs. APXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PJUL	APXM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	4.00	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.28	6.46	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	2.10	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.94	8.15	-4.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.20	55.77	-33.58

PJUL vs. APXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the APXM Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJUL and APXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PJUL vs. APXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJUL drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, which is greater than APXM's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUL and APXM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PJUL	APXM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.17%	-0.60%	-17.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.64%	-0.60%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.36%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.46%	-0.04%	-1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.65%	0.09%	+0.56%

Volatility

PJUL vs. APXM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) is 0.65%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM) has a volatility of 0.76%. This indicates that PJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PJUL	APXM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.65%	0.76%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.87%	1.06%	+2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.22%	1.22%	+4.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.61%	1.36%	+7.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.00%	1.36%	+8.64%

PJUL vs. APXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than APXM's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PJUL vs. APXM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PJUL nor APXM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PJUL and APXM in my portfolio?

PJUL and APXM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PJUL or APXM?

APXM has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to PJUL (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUL dropped -18.17% vs APXM's -0.60%.

Which ETF is better, PJUL or APXM?

On 1-year performance, PJUL leads with 14.31% vs 4.86% for APXM. On fees, PJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PJUL or APXM?

Over the 1-year period, PJUL has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PJUL or APXM?

PJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for APXM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PJUL or APXM?

PJUL and APXM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PJUL and APXM?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PJUL and 0.85% for APXM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.