PJSR.DE vs. CEBU.DE
PJSR.DE (PIMCO Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF EUR Accumulation) and CEBU.DE (iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) are both Short-Term Bond funds. PJSR.DE is actively managed, while CEBU.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, PJSR.DE returned 2.28% vs 1.84% for CEBU.DE. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PJSR.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CEBU.DE.
Performance
PJSR.DE vs. CEBU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PJSR.DE
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 2.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 0.72%
CEBU.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJSR.DE vs. CEBU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PJSR.DE PIMCO Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF EUR Accumulation | 1.14% | 2.85% | 4.36% | 1.01% |
CEBU.DE iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | -0.00% | 3.95% | 3.10% | 2.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJSR.DE and CEBU.DE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJSR.DE vs. CEBU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PJSR.DE
CEBU.DE
PJSR.DE vs. CEBU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF EUR Accumulation (PJSR.DE) and iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEBU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PJSR.DE | CEBU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.09 | 1.20 | +0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.76 | 1.46 | +4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.83 | 4.41 | +23.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PJSR.DE vs. CEBU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJSR.DE drawdown since its inception was -5.63%, which is greater than CEBU.DE's maximum drawdown of -1.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJSR.DE and CEBU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJSR.DE | CEBU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -1.48% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.39% | -1.26% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.54% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -0.26% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 0.42% | -0.34% |
Volatility
PJSR.DE vs. CEBU.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF EUR Accumulation (PJSR.DE) is 0.08%, while iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEBU.DE) has a volatility of 0.52%. This indicates that PJSR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEBU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJSR.DE | CEBU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 0.52% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.40% | 1.67% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57% | 2.07% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.56% | 2.35% | -1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.61% | 2.35% | -1.74% |
PJSR.DE vs. CEBU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJSR.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CEBU.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PJSR.DE vs. CEBU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PJSR.DE nor CEBU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PJSR.DE and CEBU.DE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PJSR.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PJSR.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEBU.DE.
They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PJSR.DE and 0.25% for CEBU.DE.
Find the right allocation for PJSR.DE and CEBU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer