CEBU.DE vs. NQSE.DE
CEBU.DE (iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and NQSE.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEBU.DE is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index (EUR Hedged), while NQSE.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CEBU.DE returned 1.84% vs 26.71% for NQSE.DE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEBU.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for NQSE.DE.
Performance
CEBU.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBU.DE achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 14.72% return.
CEBU.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 1.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NQSE.DE
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- 6M
- 16.19%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.85%
- 10Y*
- —
CEBU.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBU.DE iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.18% | 3.95% | 3.10% | 2.99% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 14.72% | 18.19% | 24.02% | 18.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBU.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBU.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBU.DE
NQSE.DE
CEBU.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEBU.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEBU.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.27 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.24 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 7.50 | -2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEBU.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBU.DE drawdown since its inception was -1.48%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBU.DE and NQSE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBU.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -37.62% | +36.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.26% | -11.88% | +10.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -3.42% | +3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | -8.51% | +8.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | 3.55% | -3.14% |
Volatility
CEBU.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEBU.DE) is 0.55%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that CEBU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBU.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 7.00% | -6.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.64% | 13.51% | -11.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09% | 17.21% | -15.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.35% | 21.11% | -18.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.35% | 21.59% | -19.24% |
CEBU.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBU.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBU.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBU.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBU.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEBU.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBU.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
CEBU.DE is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. CEBU.DE tracks iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index (EUR Hedged), while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CEBU.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBU.DE and NQSE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer