PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJGZX vs. TMMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJGZX vs. TMMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund (PJGZX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJGZX achieves a 20.32% return, which is significantly higher than TMMAX's 5.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PJGZX has outperformed TMMAX with an annualized return of 14.04%, while TMMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.66% annualized return.


PJGZX

1D
0.29%
1M
2.65%
6M
16.84%
YTD
20.32%
1Y
34.28%
3Y*
27.53%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*
14.04%

TMMAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.76%
6M
3.54%
YTD
5.40%
1Y
10.27%
3Y*
12.48%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJGZX vs. TMMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PJGZX
PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund
20.32%17.64%35.33%16.78%-10.83%27.74%1.23%30.70%-13.73%16.17%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
5.40%11.03%17.07%7.32%-3.11%24.10%1.32%24.00%-2.84%15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PJGZX and TMMAX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2007

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between PJGZX and TMMAX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJGZX vs. TMMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJGZX
PJGZX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PJGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PJGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

TMMAX
TMMAX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TMMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TMMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJGZX vs. TMMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund (PJGZX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PJGZXTMMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.23

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

1.90

+2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.24

6.45

+13.78

PJGZX vs. TMMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJGZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the TMMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJGZX and TMMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PJGZX vs. TMMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJGZX drawdown since its inception was -57.87%, which is greater than TMMAX's maximum drawdown of -41.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJGZX and TMMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJGZXTMMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.87%

-41.50%

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-5.78%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.01%

-23.00%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.91%

-23.00%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.37%

-33.41%

-2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.00%

+6.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-5.57%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.70%

+0.02%

Volatility

PJGZX vs. TMMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund (PJGZX) is 3.21%, while SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that PJGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJGZXTMMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

3.56%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

6.63%

+4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

8.54%

+4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

19.09%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

17.81%

+0.48%

PJGZX vs. TMMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJGZX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TMMAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJGZX vs. TMMAX - Dividend Comparison

PJGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.42%, less than TMMAX's 23.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJGZX
PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund
7.42%8.93%16.50%9.49%3.38%4.44%1.07%15.50%18.64%14.29%7.82%8.15%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
23.92%25.19%23.39%15.23%6.54%4.73%2.15%3.67%4.91%4.10%4.17%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJGZX and TMMAX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMMAX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to PJGZX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJGZX dropped -57.87% vs TMMAX's -41.50%.

PJGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJGZX and TMMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer