PJFM vs. PSDM
PJFM (PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF) and PSDM (PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PJFM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by PGIM, while PSDM is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PJFM returned 16.91% vs 5.16% for PSDM. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PJFM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PSDM.
Performance
PJFM vs. PSDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJFM achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly higher than PSDM's 1.23% return.
PJFM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 16.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSDM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJFM vs. PSDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PJFM PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF | 9.13% | 7.50% | 15.64% | -0.08% |
PSDM PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 1.23% | 6.16% | 5.48% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJFM and PSDM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2023 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJFM vs. PSDM — Risk / Return Rank
PJFM
PSDM
PJFM vs. PSDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJFM | PSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.64 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 4.35 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 19.69 | -13.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJFM | PSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 2.96 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 2.97 | -2.22 |
Drawdowns
PJFM vs. PSDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJFM drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, which is greater than PSDM's maximum drawdown of -1.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFM and PSDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJFM | PSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.84% | -1.19% | -21.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -1.19% | -9.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -0.16% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.75% | -0.17% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 0.26% | +2.58% |
Volatility
PJFM vs. PSDM - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM) at 0.53%. This indicates that PJFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJFM | PSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 0.53% | +5.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 1.28% | +11.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 1.75% | +13.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 2.01% | +15.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 2.01% | +15.68% |
PJFM vs. PSDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJFM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PSDM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJFM vs. PSDM - Dividend Comparison
PJFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than PSDM's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PJFM PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.83% | 0.00% |
PSDM PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 4.85% | 4.57% | 5.17% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJFM and PSDM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PJFM has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to PSDM (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJFM dropped -22.84% vs PSDM's -1.19%.
On 1-year performance, PJFM leads with 16.91% vs 5.16% for PSDM. On fees, PSDM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PSDM has been the lower-risk option at 0.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PJFM has performed better with a 16.91% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSDM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PJFM.
PSDM has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 0.57% for PJFM.
PJFM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while PSDM is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PJFM and 0.40% for PSDM.
PSDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJFM and PSDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer