PJFM vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PJFM (PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PJFM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by PGIM, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. PJFM is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, PJFM returned 16.91% vs 4.83% for IBID. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. PJFM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

PJFM vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJFM achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.46% return.

PJFM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 9.13%
• 6M: 9.53%
• 1Y: 16.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 4.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJFM vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PJFM PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF	9.13%	7.50%	15.64%	-0.08%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	2.46%	5.66%	4.71%	0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PJFM and IBID is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2023	-0.02

The correlation between PJFM and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PJFM vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFM

PJFM Risk / Return Rank: 33
PJFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
PJFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PJFM Omega Ratio Rank: 30
PJFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
PJFM Martin Ratio Rank: 39

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 97
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 97
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJFM vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PJFM	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	3.91	-2.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	6.75	-5.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.94	-0.74
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	13.33	-11.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.97	39.52	-33.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PJFM vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFM Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFM and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PJFM	IBID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	3.91	-2.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	2.56	-1.81

Drawdowns

PJFM vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFM drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFM and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	PJFM	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.84%	-1.28%	-21.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.79%	-0.36%	-10.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	0.00%	-1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-0.22%	-3.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	0.12%	+2.72%

Volatility

PJFM vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that PJFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PJFM	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	0.32%	+5.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.45%	0.80%	+11.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.65%	1.25%	+14.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.69%	2.25%	+15.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.69%	2.25%	+15.44%

PJFM vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJFM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

PJFM vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

PJFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than IBID's 3.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.66%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%
PJFM PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF	0.57%	0.62%	0.83%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PJFM and IBID in my portfolio?

PJFM and IBID have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PJFM or IBID?

PJFM has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJFM dropped -22.84% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, PJFM or IBID?

On 1-year performance, PJFM leads with 16.91% vs 4.83% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PJFM or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, PJFM has performed better with a 16.91% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PJFM or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PJFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PJFM or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.57% for PJFM.

What is the main difference between PJFM and IBID?

PJFM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PJFM and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.