PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJFM vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJFM vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJFM achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.


PJFM

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.15%
YTD
9.13%
6M
9.53%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJFM vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PJFM
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
9.13%7.50%15.64%-0.08%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PJFM and DBO is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2023

0.01

The correlation between PJFM and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PJFM vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PJFM
DBO

Industrials

19.1%

-

Financial Services

16.5%
116.0%

Technology

10.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

-

Healthcare

9.3%

-

Basic Materials

7.0%

-

Real Estate

6.9%

-

Utilities

6.6%

-

Energy

4.5%

-

Communication Services

3.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Industrials

PJFM
19.1%
DBO

-

Financial Services

PJFM
16.5%
DBO
116.0%

Technology

PJFM
10.8%
DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

PJFM
10.0%
DBO

-

Healthcare

PJFM
9.3%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

PJFM
7.0%
DBO

-

Real Estate

PJFM
6.9%
DBO

-

Utilities

PJFM
6.6%
DBO

-

Energy

PJFM
4.5%
DBO

-

Communication Services

PJFM
3.4%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

PJFM
3.2%
DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJFM vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFM
PJFM Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PJFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFM Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFM Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJFM vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJFMDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.38

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

4.44

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

9.02

-3.06

PJFM vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFM Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFM and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJFMDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.34

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.02

+0.73

Drawdowns

PJFM vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFM drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFM and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJFMDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.84%

-90.18%

+67.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-18.19%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-51.38%

+49.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-62.25%

+58.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

8.92%

-6.08%

Volatility

PJFM vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) is 5.56%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that PJFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJFMDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

12.61%

-7.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

28.20%

-15.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

34.46%

-18.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

32.29%

-14.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

31.78%

-14.09%

PJFM vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJFM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJFM vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

PJFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
PJFM
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
0.57%0.62%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJFM and DBO have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to PJFM (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJFM dropped -22.84% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 80.26% vs 16.91% for PJFM. On fees, PJFM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PJFM has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 80.26% return vs 16.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PJFM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.57% for PJFM.

PJFM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PJFM and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJFM and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer