PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJFAX vs. PIFZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJFAX vs. PIFZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z (PIFZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJFAX achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than PIFZX's 0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PJFAX has outperformed PIFZX with an annualized return of 20.29%, while PIFZX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.51% annualized return.


PJFAX

1D
-0.63%
1M
7.66%
YTD
9.23%
6M
7.87%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
20.29%

PIFZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
2.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJFAX vs. PIFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
9.23%14.53%48.10%52.76%-37.89%15.65%55.66%45.04%-1.24%36.41%
PIFZX
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z
0.70%6.66%4.47%6.20%-6.85%-0.60%5.44%6.76%0.62%2.23%

Correlation

The correlation between PJFAX and PIFZX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1996

-0.09

The correlation between PJFAX and PIFZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJFAX vs. PIFZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFAX
PJFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PJFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PIFZX
PIFZX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PIFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PIFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJFAX vs. PIFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z (PIFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJFAXPIFZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.46

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

2.69

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

10.00

-6.06

PJFAX vs. PIFZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the PIFZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFAX and PIFZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJFAXPIFZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.09

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.68

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.94

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

1.44

-0.92

Drawdowns

PJFAX vs. PIFZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFAX drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, which is greater than PIFZX's maximum drawdown of -10.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFAX and PIFZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJFAXPIFZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.07%

-10.46%

-53.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.76%

-1.74%

-16.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.05%

-1.74%

-22.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.56%

-10.46%

-33.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.56%

-10.46%

-33.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.43%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.35%

-0.91%

-19.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

0.47%

+5.08%

Volatility

PJFAX vs. PIFZX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z (PIFZX) at 0.78%. This indicates that PJFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIFZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJFAXPIFZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

0.78%

+3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

1.64%

+10.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

2.24%

+14.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.70%

2.93%

+21.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.01%

2.68%

+21.33%

PJFAX vs. PIFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJFAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than PIFZX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJFAX vs. PIFZX - Dividend Comparison

PJFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.28%, more than PIFZX's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIFZX
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z
4.12%3.99%3.22%2.85%2.24%1.99%2.49%2.85%2.83%2.77%2.65%2.82%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
12.28%13.42%24.62%7.23%2.77%14.67%9.02%16.27%6.06%5.85%4.12%6.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJFAX and PIFZX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJFAX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to PIFZX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJFAX dropped -64.07% vs PIFZX's -10.46%.

PIFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJFAX and PIFZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer