PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJFAX vs. PBEAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJFAX vs. PBEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJFAX achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than PBEAX's 14.99% return. Over the past 10 years, PJFAX has outperformed PBEAX with an annualized return of 20.19%, while PBEAX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.38% annualized return.


PJFAX

1D
-1.56%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
2.39%
6M
0.93%
1Y
11.91%
3Y*
25.56%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
20.19%

PBEAX

1D
-0.98%
1M
3.15%
YTD
14.99%
6M
13.78%
1Y
29.31%
3Y*
23.95%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
14.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJFAX vs. PBEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
2.39%14.53%48.10%52.76%-37.89%15.65%55.66%45.04%-1.24%36.41%
PBEAX
PGIM Jennison Value Fund
14.99%16.38%27.95%14.54%-8.68%26.72%2.75%36.07%-10.53%16.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PJFAX and PBEAX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 1995

0.77

The correlation between PJFAX and PBEAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJFAX vs. PBEAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFAX
PJFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PJFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

PBEAX
PBEAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PBEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PBEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJFAX vs. PBEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PJFAXPBEAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.47

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

3.80

-3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.42

15.89

-13.47

PJFAX vs. PBEAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the PBEAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFAX and PBEAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PJFAX vs. PBEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFAX drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, which is greater than PBEAX's maximum drawdown of -58.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFAX and PBEAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJFAXPBEAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.07%

-58.23%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.76%

-7.99%

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.05%

-16.29%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.56%

-20.02%

-23.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.56%

-38.31%

-5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-0.98%

-5.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.32%

-7.96%

-12.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

1.91%

+3.76%

Volatility

PJFAX vs. PBEAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX) at 4.11%. This indicates that PJFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJFAXPBEAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

4.11%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

9.33%

+4.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

11.55%

+5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.81%

15.20%

+9.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.05%

17.55%

+6.50%

PJFAX vs. PBEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJFAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than PBEAX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJFAX vs. PBEAX - Dividend Comparison

PJFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.10%, more than PBEAX's 8.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBEAX
PGIM Jennison Value Fund
8.80%10.12%14.05%7.33%8.28%6.93%4.01%16.61%10.18%6.90%4.26%8.10%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
13.10%13.42%24.62%7.23%2.77%14.67%9.02%16.27%6.06%5.85%4.12%6.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJFAX and PBEAX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJFAX has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to PBEAX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJFAX dropped -64.07% vs PBEAX's -58.23%.

PBEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJFAX and PBEAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer