PJDZX vs. QCELX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PJDZX (PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund) and QCELX (AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PJDZX returned 14.69%/yr vs 15.20%/yr for QCELX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PJDZX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for QCELX.

Performance

PJDZX vs. QCELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund (PJDZX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJDZX achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly lower than QCELX's 18.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PJDZX having a 14.69% annualized return and QCELX not far ahead at 15.20%.

PJDZX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 2.88%
• YTD: 11.45%
• 6M: 11.49%
• 1Y: 24.85%
• 3Y*: 27.22%
• 5Y*: 14.25%
• 10Y*: 14.69%

QCELX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 6.79%
• YTD: 18.09%
• 6M: 19.95%
• 1Y: 38.37%
• 3Y*: 27.48%
• 5Y*: 16.17%
• 10Y*: 15.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJDZX vs. QCELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PJDZX PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund	11.45%	18.84%	40.98%	8.67%	-10.35%	24.62%	13.96%	32.01%	-7.14%	17.53%
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund	18.09%	23.38%	22.73%	26.30%	-15.73%	27.18%	14.93%	24.33%	-10.96%	22.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PJDZX and QCELX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2014	0.89

The correlation between PJDZX and QCELX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PJDZX vs. QCELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJDZX

PJDZX Risk / Return Rank: 72
PJDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
PJDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
PJDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
PJDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PJDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

QCELX

QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 90
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJDZX vs. QCELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund (PJDZX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PJDZX	QCELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	3.11	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	4.21	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.55	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	5.00	-1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.95	23.00	-6.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PJDZX vs. QCELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJDZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the QCELX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJDZX and QCELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PJDZX	QCELX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	3.11	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.86	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.80	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.72	+0.06

Drawdowns

PJDZX vs. QCELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJDZX drawdown since its inception was -33.59%, roughly equal to the maximum QCELX drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJDZX and QCELX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PJDZX	QCELX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.59%	-33.52%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.54%	-7.92%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.11%	-18.38%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.57%	-28.70%	+11.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.59%	-33.52%	-0.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.25%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-5.66%	+1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	1.72%	-0.22%

Volatility

PJDZX vs. QCELX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund (PJDZX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) have volatilities of 3.08% and 3.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PJDZX	QCELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	3.06%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.61%	9.34%	-0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.68%	12.75%	-2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.47%	18.93%	-2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.31%	18.97%	-1.66%

PJDZX vs. QCELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJDZX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QCELX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

PJDZX vs. QCELX - Dividend Comparison

PJDZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, less than QCELX's 12.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PJDZX PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund	5.77%	6.44%	34.62%	1.21%	0.93%	8.48%	4.75%	4.32%	10.34%	1.83%	1.48%	1.31%
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund	12.19%	14.40%	12.89%	13.67%	11.05%	12.41%	9.94%	5.36%	7.81%	0.99%	1.28%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PJDZX and QCELX in my portfolio?

PJDZX and QCELX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PJDZX or QCELX?

PJDZX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to QCELX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJDZX dropped -33.59% vs QCELX's -33.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.