PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJBF vs. VMOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PJBF vs. VMOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PJBF vs. VMOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PJBF
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF
-11.38%5.13%19.91%-0.80%
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
6.19%18.54%12.07%0.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJBF achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than VMOT's 6.19% return.


PJBF

1D
4.21%
1M
-5.84%
YTD
-11.38%
6M
-10.75%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VMOT

1D
3.68%
1M
-7.57%
YTD
6.19%
6M
11.24%
1Y
30.33%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PJBF vs. VMOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJBF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than VMOT's 1.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PJBF vs. VMOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJBF
PJBF Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PJBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJBF Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PJBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJBF Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VMOT
VMOT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJBF vs. VMOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJBFVMOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.23

1.62

-1.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.49

2.21

-1.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.34

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

2.38

-2.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.80

10.49

-9.68

PJBF vs. VMOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the VMOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJBF and VMOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJBFVMOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

1.62

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.28

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between PJBF and VMOT is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PJBF vs. VMOT - Dividend Comparison

PJBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than VMOT's 1.93% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PJBF
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF
0.27%0.24%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
1.93%2.05%2.54%4.13%2.24%0.82%0.00%1.76%0.93%0.81%

Drawdowns

PJBF vs. VMOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJBF drawdown since its inception was -25.67%, smaller than the maximum VMOT drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJBF and VMOT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PJBFVMOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.67%

-34.71%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.41%

-13.08%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.98%

-7.57%

-7.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-13.55%

+8.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

2.96%

+2.54%

Volatility

PJBF vs. VMOT - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) has a higher volatility of 8.67% compared to Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) at 8.08%. This indicates that PJBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PJBFVMOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.67%

8.08%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

11.74%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.29%

18.83%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.31%

15.65%

+5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

14.82%

+6.49%