PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJAN vs. JULW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PJAN vs. JULW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PJAN vs. JULW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January
-1.66%11.29%13.45%18.18%-5.29%8.80%8.82%
JULW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF
-0.44%11.57%12.39%16.06%-1.09%4.60%6.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJAN achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly lower than JULW's -0.44% return.


PJAN

1D
0.24%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
-1.66%
6M
0.95%
1Y
11.31%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*

JULW

1D
0.36%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
1.29%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
11.46%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PJAN vs. JULW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULW's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PJAN vs. JULW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJAN
PJAN Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

JULW
JULW Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JULW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULW Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JULW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJAN vs. JULW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJANJULWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

1.47

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

2.26

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.01

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.42

11.75

-3.33

PJAN vs. JULW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the JULW Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJAN and JULW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJANJULWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.47

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

1.19

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.30

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between PJAN and JULW is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PJAN vs. JULW - Dividend Comparison

Neither PJAN nor JULW has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
PJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JULW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.04%

Drawdowns

PJAN vs. JULW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJAN drawdown since its inception was -21.25%, which is greater than JULW's maximum drawdown of -9.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJAN and JULW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PJANJULWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.25%

-9.49%

-11.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-6.47%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.93%

-9.49%

-2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-1.37%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-0.94%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

1.11%

+0.26%

Volatility

PJAN vs. JULW - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW) at 2.41%. This indicates that PJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JULW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PJANJULWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

2.41%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.60%

3.45%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.87%

8.67%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.91%

6.86%

+2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.69%

6.61%

+4.08%