PIZ vs. VFMO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PIZ (Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. PIZ is passively managed, while VFMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PIZ returned 10.11%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for VFMO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIZ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.

Performance

PIZ vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIZ achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 25.84% return.

PIZ

• 1D: -4.77%
• 1M: -0.77%
• YTD: 14.98%
• 6M: 14.14%
• 1Y: 26.96%
• 3Y*: 25.46%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: 11.51%

VFMO

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: 4.69%
• YTD: 25.84%
• 6M: 22.71%
• 1Y: 44.30%
• 3Y*: 27.88%
• 5Y*: 14.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIZ vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PIZ Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF	14.98%	37.22%	16.30%	17.96%	-30.48%	20.53%	17.96%	27.51%	-17.22%
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	25.84%	17.39%	26.14%	16.25%	-12.84%	19.16%	31.36%	28.22%	-11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PIZ and VFMO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018	0.72

The correlation between PIZ and VFMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

PIZ vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PIZ	VFMO
Industrials	40.8%	24.7%
Financial Services	25.4%	6.5%
Technology	14.3%	17.5%
Basic Materials	4.2%	6.4%
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	8.7%
Utilities	1.5%	0.2%
Energy	1.1%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	2.5%
Healthcare	0.7%	22.9%
Real Estate	0.4%	0.1%
Communication Services	-	3.4%

Return for Risk

PIZ vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIZ

PIZ Risk / Return Rank: 38
PIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44

VFMO

VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 67
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIZ vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PIZ	VFMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.99	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.59	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.34	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	4.05	-2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.92	15.07	-8.15

PIZ vs. VFMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the VFMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIZ and VFMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PIZ vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIZ drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than VFMO's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIZ and VFMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIZ	VFMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.61%	-36.77%	-23.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.35%	-10.98%	-3.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.67%	-24.40%	+9.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.93%	-25.80%	-15.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.31%	-2.31%	-3.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.89%	-7.73%	-7.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.90%	2.95%	+0.95%

Volatility

PIZ vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) has a higher volatility of 10.97% compared to Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) at 8.33%. This indicates that PIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIZ	VFMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.97%	8.33%	+2.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.32%	17.49%	+2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.48%	22.34%	+0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.37%	21.90%	-1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.63%	23.64%	-4.01%

PIZ vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIZ vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison

PIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than VFMO's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PIZ Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF	1.49%	1.55%	1.68%	1.86%	2.04%	1.01%	0.37%	1.58%	1.06%	1.30%	2.21%	1.09%
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	0.39%	0.82%	0.72%	0.89%	1.72%	0.81%	0.45%	1.22%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIZ and VFMO in my portfolio?

PIZ and VFMO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PIZ or VFMO?

PIZ has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to VFMO (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIZ dropped -60.61% vs VFMO's -36.77%.

Which ETF is better, PIZ or VFMO?

On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 14.02% vs 10.11% for PIZ. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMO has been the lower-risk option at 8.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PIZ or VFMO?

Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 10.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PIZ or VFMO?

VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PIZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PIZ or VFMO?

PIZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.39% for VFMO.

What is the main difference between PIZ and VFMO?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PIZ and 0.13% for VFMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.