PIT vs. EMEQ

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) and EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck, while EMEQ is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PIT returned 45.92% vs 141.42% for EMEQ. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PIT charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMEQ.

Performance

PIT vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIT achieves a 32.48% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 70.13% return.

PIT

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -9.34%
• YTD: 32.48%
• 6M: 34.12%
• 1Y: 45.92%
• 3Y*: 21.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMEQ

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 10.20%
• YTD: 70.13%
• 6M: 81.37%
• 1Y: 141.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIT vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	32.48%	21.63%	7.30%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	70.13%	69.78%	-0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PIT and EMEQ is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.12

The correlation between PIT and EMEQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PIT vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 82
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 95
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIT vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PIT	EMEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	3.89	-1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	4.03	-1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.61	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.66	7.71	-3.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.95	28.78	-12.84

PIT vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIT and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PIT vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIT drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum EMEQ drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIT and EMEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIT	EMEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-19.99%	+7.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.56%	-17.91%	+7.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.56%	-5.69%	-4.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.02%	-4.05%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	4.79%	-1.71%

Volatility

PIT vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) is 4.99%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 19.34%. This indicates that PIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIT	EMEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	19.34%	-14.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.29%	32.54%	-13.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.58%	35.48%	-13.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	31.87%	-14.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	31.87%	-14.37%

PIT vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIT vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than EMEQ's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.62%	2.76%	0.84%	0.00%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	6.73%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIT and EMEQ in my portfolio?

PIT and EMEQ have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PIT or EMEQ?

EMEQ has higher volatility (19.34%) compared to PIT (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIT dropped -12.27% vs EMEQ's -19.99%.

Which ETF is better, PIT or EMEQ?

On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 141.42% vs 45.92% for PIT. On fees, PIT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PIT has been the lower-risk option at 4.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PIT or EMEQ?

Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 141.42% return vs 45.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PIT or EMEQ?

PIT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PIT or EMEQ?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.73%, compared with 1.62% for EMEQ.

What is the main difference between PIT and EMEQ?

PIT is categorized as Commodities, while EMEQ is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Nomura. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PIT and 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.