PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIT vs. COHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIT vs. COHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Coherent, Inc. (COHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIT achieves a 30.77% return, which is significantly lower than COHR's 124.22% return.


PIT

1D
-1.29%
1M
-10.51%
YTD
30.77%
6M
32.74%
1Y
44.04%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
10Y*

COHR

1D
7.48%
1M
8.21%
YTD
124.22%
6M
131.91%
1Y
434.88%
3Y*
96.11%
5Y*
43.17%
10Y*
35.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIT vs. COHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
30.77%21.63%6.77%-4.54%1.67%
COHR
Coherent, Inc.
124.22%94.84%117.62%24.02%4.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PIT and COHR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIT vs. COHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

COHR
COHR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
COHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
COHR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
COHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
COHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIT vs. COHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Coherent, Inc. (COHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PITCOHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.59

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

16.54

-12.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.96

45.32

-31.37

PIT vs. COHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is lower than the COHR Sharpe Ratio of 5.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIT and COHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIT vs. COHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIT drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum COHR drawdown of -80.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIT and COHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PITCOHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.27%

-80.89%

+68.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-26.52%

+14.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.27%

-54.85%

+42.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.71%

-3.06%

-8.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-35.01%

+30.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

9.66%

-6.50%

Volatility

PIT vs. COHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) is 5.06%, while Coherent, Inc. (COHR) has a volatility of 28.85%. This indicates that PIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PITCOHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

28.85%

-23.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.35%

57.84%

-38.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

73.98%

-52.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

61.69%

-44.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

56.62%

-39.11%

Dividends

PIT vs. COHR - Dividend Comparison

PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, while COHR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
COHR
Coherent, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
6.82%8.92%3.59%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIT and COHR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COHR has higher volatility (28.85%) compared to PIT (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIT dropped -12.27% vs COHR's -80.89%.

COHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.94 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIT and COHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer