PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PISHX vs. FACVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PISHX vs. FACVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PISHX achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than FACVX's 13.96% return.


PISHX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.57%
6M
1.55%
YTD
2.24%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.90%

FACVX

1D
3.00%
1M
-3.58%
6M
8.53%
YTD
13.96%
1Y
25.05%
3Y*
13.57%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
11.56%
ALL TIME*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PISHX vs. FACVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PISHX
Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares
2.24%9.65%12.50%7.91%-11.73%4.30%8.57%12.46%
FACVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A
13.96%17.95%7.92%11.06%-15.59%9.63%42.09%15.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PISHX and FACVX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PISHX vs. FACVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PISHX
PISHX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PISHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PISHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PISHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PISHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PISHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FACVX
FACVX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FACVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FACVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PISHX vs. FACVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PISHXFACVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.24

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.01

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.74

7.85

+1.89

PISHX vs. FACVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PISHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the FACVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PISHX and FACVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PISHX vs. FACVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PISHX drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, which is greater than FACVX's maximum drawdown of -25.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PISHX and FACVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PISHXFACVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.12%

-25.09%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-11.67%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.90%

-18.91%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.14%

-24.32%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-9.02%

+8.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-5.76%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

2.97%

-2.34%

Volatility

PISHX vs. FACVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX) is 0.50%, while Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that PISHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FACVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PISHXFACVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.50%

6.05%

-5.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.08%

13.95%

-11.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43%

16.97%

-14.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.57%

13.91%

-9.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.28%

13.86%

-6.58%

PISHX vs. FACVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PISHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FACVX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

PISHX vs. FACVX - Dividend Comparison

PISHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, less than FACVX's 9.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A
9.01%11.18%1.85%1.86%3.48%20.42%10.56%3.04%9.55%3.89%4.62%10.02%
PISHX
Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares
5.15%5.52%5.89%5.92%5.45%4.25%4.59%3.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PISHX and FACVX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FACVX has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to PISHX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PISHX dropped -27.12% vs FACVX's -25.09%.

PISHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PISHX and FACVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer