PIPAX vs. FAOSX
PIPAX (PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PIPAX returned 11.54%/yr vs 3.25%/yr for FAOSX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIPAX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
PIPAX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PIPAX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -2.41%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- —
PIPAX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIPAX PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A | 12.78% | 16.57% | 14.37% | 21.29% | -9.30% | 18.02% | 3.78% | 25.94% | -10.40% | 17.66% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.73% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPAX and FAOSX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PIPAX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIPAX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
PIPAX
FAOSX
PIPAX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIPAX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.91 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | -0.47 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | -0.73 | +7.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIPAX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPAX drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, which is greater than FAOSX's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPAX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIPAX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.80% | -36.24% | -21.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.72% | -7.26% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.24% | -13.96% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.17% | -36.24% | +17.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -5.86% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -7.91% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 4.31% | -1.22% |
Volatility
PIPAX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that PIPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIPAX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 0.00% | +3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | 2.59% | +9.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 8.27% | +6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.34% | 16.69% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 16.60% | -2.18% |
PIPAX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIPAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIPAX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
PIPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIPAX PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A | 5.38% | 5.61% | 12.69% | 10.56% | 10.66% | 7.59% | 1.44% | 11.71% | 8.25% | 7.38% | 0.78% | 8.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIPAX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIPAX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPAX dropped -57.80% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
PIPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIPAX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer