PIPAX vs. EADOX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX).
PIPAX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Oct 31, 2003. EADOX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Sep 3, 2015.
Performance
PIPAX vs. EADOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PIPAX vs. EADOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIPAX PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A | -0.96% | 16.57% | 14.37% | 21.29% | -9.30% | 18.02% | 3.78% | 25.94% | -10.40% | 18.30% |
EADOX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A | 1.35% | 16.93% | 14.52% | 11.13% | -6.42% | 1.24% | 7.12% | 17.85% | -4.44% | 12.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIPAX achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than EADOX's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PIPAX has outperformed EADOX with an annualized return of 11.00%, while EADOX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.56% annualized return.
PIPAX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -9.41%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
EADOX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 14.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PIPAX vs. EADOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIPAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than EADOX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PIPAX vs. EADOX — Risk / Return Rank
PIPAX
EADOX
PIPAX vs. EADOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIPAX | EADOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 4.04 | -3.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 5.66 | -4.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 2.03 | -0.90 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 3.96 | -3.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 16.16 | -13.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIPAX | EADOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 4.04 | -3.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 1.70 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 1.61 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.62 | -1.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPAX and EADOX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PIPAX vs. EADOX - Dividend Comparison
PIPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, less than EADOX's 10.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIPAX PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A | 5.66% | 5.61% | 12.69% | 10.56% | 10.66% | 7.59% | 1.44% | 11.71% | 8.25% | 7.38% | 0.78% | 8.16% |
EADOX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A | 10.86% | 10.51% | 8.27% | 8.73% | 8.87% | 7.56% | 7.42% | 7.57% | 7.83% | 7.61% | 4.04% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PIPAX vs. EADOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPAX drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, which is greater than EADOX's maximum drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPAX and EADOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIPAX | EADOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.80% | -19.15% | -38.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -3.61% | -9.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.17% | -17.56% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.55% | -19.15% | -16.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.41% | -3.61% | -5.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -2.56% | -4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 0.89% | +2.74% |
Volatility
PIPAX vs. EADOX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX) at 1.81%. This indicates that PIPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EADOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PIPAX | EADOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 1.81% | +4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 2.67% | +9.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 3.62% | +13.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 4.53% | +9.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 4.72% | +9.88% |