PIOBX vs. BGHSX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pioneer Bond Fund (PIOBX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX).

PIOBX is managed by Amundi. It was launched on Oct 31, 1978. BGHSX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 3, 2014.

Performance

PIOBX vs. BGHSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer Bond Fund (PIOBX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PIOBX vs. BGHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PIOBX Pioneer Bond Fund	-0.56%	8.09%	1.22%	5.68%	-14.96%	-0.88%
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund	-1.95%	5.55%	9.90%	13.21%	-10.23%	1.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIOBX achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly higher than BGHSX's -1.95% return.

PIOBX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -0.56%
• 6M: 0.43%
• 1Y: 4.23%
• 3Y*: 3.53%
• 5Y*: 0.04%
• 10Y*: 2.06%

BGHSX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: -1.95%
• 6M: -1.37%
• 1Y: 3.08%
• 3Y*: 7.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIOBX vs. BGHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIOBX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BGHSX's 0.54% expense ratio.

PIOBX

Pioneer Bond Fund

BGHSX

BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund

Return for Risk

PIOBX vs. BGHSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIOBX

PIOBX Risk / Return Rank: 60
PIOBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
PIOBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PIOBX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
PIOBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PIOBX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

BGHSX

BGHSX Risk / Return Rank: 39
BGHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BGHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
BGHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BGHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
BGHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIOBX vs. BGHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Bond Fund (PIOBX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PIOBX	BGHSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	0.88	+0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	1.25	+0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.20	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	0.90	+0.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.66	3.42	+2.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PIOBX vs. BGHSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIOBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the BGHSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIOBX and BGHSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PIOBX	BGHSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	0.88	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.76	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between PIOBX and BGHSX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PIOBX vs. BGHSX - Dividend Comparison

PIOBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than BGHSX's 6.50% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PIOBX Pioneer Bond Fund	3.45%	3.78%	3.31%	2.46%	1.62%	5.71%	4.62%	3.02%	3.13%	3.01%	2.97%	3.05%
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund	6.50%	7.08%	7.49%	5.23%	5.32%	4.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PIOBX vs. BGHSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIOBX drawdown since its inception was -21.80%, which is greater than BGHSX's maximum drawdown of -14.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIOBX and BGHSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIOBX	BGHSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.80%	-14.30%	-7.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.96%	-3.43%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.18%	-2.00%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.56%	-3.33%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	0.90%	+0.05%

Volatility

PIOBX vs. BGHSX - Volatility Comparison

Pioneer Bond Fund (PIOBX) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) at 1.06%. This indicates that PIOBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIOBX	BGHSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.53%	1.06%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.47%	2.13%	+0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.46%	3.88%	+0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.97%	4.49%	+1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.91%	4.49%	+0.42%