PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINS vs. LYMD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PINS vs. LYMD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PINS is traded in USD, while LYMD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYMD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINS achieves a -24.68% return, which is significantly lower than LYMD.DE's -8.22% return.


PINS

1D
-3.80%
1M
1.09%
YTD
-24.68%
6M
-26.11%
1Y
-43.02%
3Y*
-9.42%
5Y*
-23.57%
10Y*

LYMD.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
3.15%
YTD
-8.22%
6M
-9.48%
1Y
-9.47%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
7.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINS vs. LYMD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
-24.68%-10.72%-21.71%52.55%-33.20%-44.84%253.54%-21.52%
LYMD.DE
Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc
-8.22%0.92%9.17%18.63%-8.29%23.54%12.24%-1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PINS and LYMD.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019

0.21

The correlation between PINS and LYMD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINS vs. LYMD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINS
PINS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINS Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

LYMD.DE
LYMD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
LYMD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINS vs. LYMD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PINSLYMD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.92

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

-0.44

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

-0.96

-0.24

PINS vs. LYMD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINS Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the LYMD.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINS and LYMD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PINS vs. LYMD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINS drawdown since its inception was -82.70%, which is greater than LYMD.DE's maximum drawdown of -73.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINS and LYMD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINSLYMD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.70%

-73.32%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.63%

-21.41%

-39.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.72%

-27.64%

-38.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.79%

-27.64%

-53.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.13%

-19.81%

-58.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.41%

-24.64%

-27.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.92%

9.84%

+26.08%

Volatility

PINS vs. LYMD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) has a higher volatility of 14.77% compared to Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) at 4.80%. This indicates that PINS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYMD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINSLYMD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.77%

4.80%

+9.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.54%

14.50%

+24.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.02%

16.84%

+33.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.87%

17.27%

+38.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.15%

20.79%

+40.36%

Dividends

PINS vs. LYMD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither PINS nor LYMD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PINS and LYMD.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINS and LYMD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer