PINS vs. INFA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Informatica Inc. (INFA).

Performance

PINS vs. INFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Informatica Inc. (INFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PINS vs. INFA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PINS Pinterest, Inc.	-6.68%
INFA Informatica Inc.	0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PINS : $12.39B INFA : $7.70B
EPS PINS : $0.61 INFA : $0.03
PE Ratio PINS : 30.15 INFA : 727.98
PS Ratio PINS : 2.98 INFA : 4.53
PB Ratio PINS : 2.61 INFA : 3.14
Total Revenue (TTM) PINS : $4.22B INFA : $1.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) PINS : $3.38B INFA : $1.36B
EBITDA (TTM) PINS : $396.24M INFA : $323.83M

Returns By Period

PINS

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 4.63%
• YTD: -29.35%
• 6M: -42.57%
• 1Y: -41.00%
• 3Y*: -12.47%
• 5Y*: -25.13%
• 10Y*: —

INFA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PINS vs. INFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINS

PINS Risk / Return Rank: 12
PINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
PINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PINS Omega Ratio Rank: 10
PINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
PINS Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINS vs. INFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Informatica Inc. (INFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PINS	INFA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.90	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.45	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PINS	INFA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	—	—

Dividends

PINS vs. INFA - Dividend Comparison

Neither PINS nor INFA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PINS vs. INFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINS drawdown since its inception was -82.70%, which is greater than INFA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINS and INFA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PINS	INFA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.70%	0.00%	-82.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.48%	0.00%	-79.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.65%	0.00%	-51.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PINS	INFA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.15%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.82%	0.00%	+52.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.08%	0.00%	+56.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.50%	0.00%	+61.50%

Financials

PINS vs. INFA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pinterest, Inc. and Informatica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PINS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.09B and revenue of 1.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.8%.

INFA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Informatica Inc. reported a gross profit of 358.74M and revenue of 439.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.7%.

PINS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported an operating income of 301.17M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.8%.

INFA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Informatica Inc. reported an operating income of 60.87M and revenue of 439.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

PINS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported a net income of 277.07M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.

INFA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Informatica Inc. reported a net income of 4.00M and revenue of 439.16M, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.