PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINK vs. JDOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PINK vs. JDOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINK achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly higher than JDOC's -4.49% return.


PINK

1D
1.24%
1M
7.28%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.11%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
10Y*

JDOC

1D
0.50%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-4.49%
6M
-4.39%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINK vs. JDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
2.39%24.34%8.81%11.65%
JDOC
Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF
-4.49%15.36%-1.04%10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PINK and JDOC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023

0.79

The correlation between PINK and JDOC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

PINK vs. JDOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PINK
JDOC

Healthcare

93.1%
100.0%

Industrials

6.9%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PINK
93.1%
JDOC
100.0%

Industrials

PINK
6.9%
JDOC

-

Financial Services

PINK
0.0%
JDOC

-

Basic Materials

PINK

-

JDOC

-

Communication Services

PINK

-

JDOC

-

Consumer Cyclical

PINK

-

JDOC

-

Consumer Defensive

PINK

-

JDOC

-

Energy

PINK

-

JDOC

-

Real Estate

PINK

-

JDOC

-

Technology

PINK

-

JDOC

-

Utilities

PINK

-

JDOC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINK vs. JDOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINK
PINK Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PINK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINK Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PINK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINK Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

JDOC
JDOC Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINK vs. JDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINKJDOCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

0.88

+0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

1.38

+1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.16

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.28

+0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.62

3.34

+2.28

PINK vs. JDOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINK Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the JDOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINK and JDOC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PINKJDOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

0.88

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.53

+0.03

Drawdowns

PINK vs. JDOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINK drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum JDOC drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINK and JDOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINKJDOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-20.87%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.81%

-9.68%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-7.47%

+4.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-6.98%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.57%

3.71%

+1.86%

Volatility

PINK vs. JDOC - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) at 3.97%. This indicates that PINK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JDOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINKJDOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

3.97%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

9.97%

+3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.17%

14.08%

+4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

14.32%

+3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

14.32%

+3.25%

PINK vs. JDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than JDOC's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PINK vs. JDOC - Dividend Comparison

PINK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than JDOC's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JDOC
Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF
0.93%0.89%5.57%0.15%0.00%0.00%
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
0.67%0.68%0.32%0.94%0.42%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


PINK and JDOC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PINK has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to JDOC (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINK dropped -18.77% vs JDOC's -20.87%.

On 1-year performance, PINK leads with 31.27% vs 12.36% for JDOC. On fees, PINK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, JDOC has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PINK has performed better with a 31.27% return vs 12.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PINK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JDOC.

JDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.67% for PINK.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PINK and 0.65% for JDOC.

PINK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINK and JDOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer