PINK vs. DBO
PINK (Simplify Health Care ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PINK is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. PINK is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PINK returned 14.42%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for DBO. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. PINK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
PINK vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PINK achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
PINK
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 7.28%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
PINK vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF | 2.39% | 24.34% | 8.81% | 3.80% | -4.41% | 12.20% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | -6.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PINK and DBO is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2021 | -0.04 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PINK and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.33, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
PINK vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PINK
DBO
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PINK
DBO
-
Industrials
PINK
DBO
-
Financial Services
PINK
DBO
Basic Materials
PINK
-
DBO
-
Communication Services
PINK
-
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
PINK
-
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
PINK
-
DBO
-
Energy
PINK
-
DBO
-
Real Estate
PINK
-
DBO
-
Technology
PINK
-
DBO
-
Utilities
PINK
-
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PINK vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
PINK
DBO
PINK vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PINK | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 4.44 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 9.02 | -3.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PINK | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.34 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.02 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
PINK vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PINK drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINK and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PINK | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.77% | -90.18% | +71.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.81% | -18.19% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -28.20% | +9.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -51.38% | +48.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -62.25% | +55.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.57% | 8.92% | -3.35% |
Volatility
PINK vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) is 4.36%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that PINK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PINK | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 12.61% | -8.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 28.20% | -14.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.17% | 34.46% | -16.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 32.29% | -14.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 31.78% | -14.21% |
PINK vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PINK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
PINK vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
PINK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.32% | 0.94% | 0.42% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PINK and DBO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to PINK (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINK dropped -18.77% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 21.86% vs 14.42% for PINK. On fees, PINK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PINK has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 14.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PINK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.67% for PINK.
PINK is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PINK and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PINK and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer