PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINDX vs. PBMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PINDX vs. PBMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund (PINDX) and Pioneer AMT Free Municipal Fund (PBMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINDX achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly higher than PBMFX's 1.61% return. Over the past 10 years, PINDX has outperformed PBMFX with an annualized return of 16.66%, while PBMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.86% annualized return.


PINDX

1D
-0.50%
1M
5.28%
YTD
11.68%
6M
9.92%
1Y
32.35%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
13.74%
10Y*
16.66%

PBMFX

1D
0.41%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.32%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
1.58%
5Y*
-1.98%
10Y*
0.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINDX vs. PBMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PINDX
Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund
11.68%21.16%19.33%28.67%-21.49%25.59%34.78%35.61%-5.08%26.41%
PBMFX
Pioneer AMT Free Municipal Fund
1.61%-1.43%0.80%7.15%-17.35%1.54%6.75%9.82%0.11%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PINDX and PBMFX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 1998

-0.09

The correlation between PINDX and PBMFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINDX vs. PBMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINDX
PINDX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

PBMFX
PBMFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PBMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PBMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINDX vs. PBMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund (PINDX) and Pioneer AMT Free Municipal Fund (PBMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINDXPBMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.53

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

4.79

+3.19

PINDX vs. PBMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the PBMFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINDX and PBMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PINDXPBMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.36

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

-0.27

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.13

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.46

+0.03

Drawdowns

PINDX vs. PBMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINDX drawdown since its inception was -52.37%, which is greater than PBMFX's maximum drawdown of -24.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINDX and PBMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINDXPBMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.37%

-24.21%

-28.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.64%

-4.33%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.52%

-11.49%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.77%

-24.21%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.82%

-24.21%

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-10.88%

+10.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.48%

-4.70%

-6.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

1.38%

+2.88%

Volatility

PINDX vs. PBMFX - Volatility Comparison

Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund (PINDX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Pioneer AMT Free Municipal Fund (PBMFX) at 1.76%. This indicates that PINDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINDXPBMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

1.76%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

3.61%

+8.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.58%

4.89%

+11.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.74%

7.42%

+12.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.54%

6.64%

+12.90%

PINDX vs. PBMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINDX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PBMFX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

PINDX vs. PBMFX - Dividend Comparison

PINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than PBMFX's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBMFX
Pioneer AMT Free Municipal Fund
4.94%4.82%2.32%2.15%2.01%1.97%3.06%2.91%2.94%2.70%2.97%3.62%
PINDX
Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund
4.04%4.51%6.34%0.17%7.23%33.14%27.35%5.20%26.83%12.86%8.57%6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


PINDX and PBMFX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PINDX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to PBMFX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINDX dropped -52.37% vs PBMFX's -24.21%.

PINDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINDX and PBMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer