PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINCX vs. ARINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PINCX vs. ARINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Income Fund (PINCX) and Archer Income Fund (ARINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINCX achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than ARINX's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PINCX has underperformed ARINX with an annualized return of 2.05%, while ARINX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.21% annualized return.


PINCX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.92%
6M
0.88%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
4.87%
5Y*
-0.30%
10Y*
2.05%

ARINX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.64%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
2.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINCX vs. ARINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PINCX
Putnam Income Fund
0.92%7.51%2.59%4.79%-12.96%-5.39%7.06%11.19%0.46%5.83%
ARINX
Archer Income Fund
0.64%4.42%4.90%3.99%-6.84%1.52%4.29%6.19%0.35%3.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PINCX and ARINX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2011

0.59

Over the past year, PINCX and ARINX have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.59, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINCX vs. ARINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINCX
PINCX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PINCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PINCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ARINX
ARINX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ARINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ARINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINCX vs. ARINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Income Fund (PINCX) and Archer Income Fund (ARINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINCXARINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.48

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.61

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

9.10

-1.23

PINCX vs. ARINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the ARINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINCX and ARINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PINCXARINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.29

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.67

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

1.13

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.54

+0.23

Drawdowns

PINCX vs. ARINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINCX drawdown since its inception was -30.57%, which is greater than ARINX's maximum drawdown of -9.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINCX and ARINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINCXARINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.57%

-9.38%

-21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.40%

-1.57%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.73%

-1.57%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.78%

-9.38%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.16%

-9.38%

-12.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.95%

-0.57%

-3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-1.73%

-2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.45%

+0.33%

Volatility

PINCX vs. ARINX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Income Fund (PINCX) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to Archer Income Fund (ARINX) at 0.80%. This indicates that PINCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINCXARINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

0.80%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

1.46%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73%

1.79%

+1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

2.06%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.28%

1.97%

+3.31%

PINCX vs. ARINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINCX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than ARINX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

PINCX vs. ARINX - Dividend Comparison

PINCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than ARINX's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARINX
Archer Income Fund
3.58%2.72%3.77%3.15%2.72%2.56%2.66%2.69%2.84%2.94%2.84%2.79%
PINCX
Putnam Income Fund
4.55%4.63%8.70%7.35%7.70%2.15%5.46%4.65%3.57%3.46%3.21%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


PINCX and ARINX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PINCX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to ARINX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINCX dropped -30.57% vs ARINX's -9.38%.

ARINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINCX and ARINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer