PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINCX vs. ARINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PINCX vs. ARINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Income Fund (PINCX) and Archer Income Fund (ARINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINCX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than ARINX's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PINCX has underperformed ARINX with an annualized return of 1.76%, while ARINX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.06% annualized return.


PINCX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.29%
YTD
-0.11%
1Y
2.54%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
-0.60%
10Y*
1.76%
ALL TIME*
3.95%

ARINX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.35%
6M
0.07%
YTD
0.42%
1Y
2.37%
3Y*
4.22%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
2.06%
ALL TIME*
2.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PINCX vs. ARINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PINCX
Putnam Income Fund
-0.11%7.51%2.59%4.79%-12.96%-5.39%7.06%11.19%0.46%5.83%
ARINX
Archer Income Fund
0.42%4.42%4.90%3.99%-6.84%1.52%4.29%6.19%0.35%3.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PINCX and ARINX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2011

0.60

Over the past year, PINCX and ARINX have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.60, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINCX vs. ARINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PINCX
PINCX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PINCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PINCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ARINX
ARINX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ARINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARINX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ARINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARINX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PINCX vs. ARINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Income Fund (PINCX) and Archer Income Fund (ARINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PINCXARINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.29

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.73

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

5.34

-1.54

PINCX vs. ARINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the ARINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINCX and ARINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PINCX vs. ARINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINCX drawdown since its inception was -30.57%, which is greater than ARINX's maximum drawdown of -9.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINCX and ARINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINCXARINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.57%

-9.38%

-21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.40%

-1.57%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.08%

-1.57%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

-9.38%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.16%

-9.38%

-12.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.93%

-0.79%

-4.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-1.71%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.51%

+0.37%

Volatility

PINCX vs. ARINX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Income Fund (PINCX) has a higher volatility of 0.82% compared to Archer Income Fund (ARINX) at 0.53%. This indicates that PINCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINCXARINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

0.53%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

1.57%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

1.83%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

2.09%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.28%

1.97%

+3.31%

PINCX vs. ARINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINCX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than ARINX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

PINCX vs. ARINX - Dividend Comparison

PINCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than ARINX's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARINX
Archer Income Fund
3.61%2.72%3.77%3.15%2.72%2.56%2.66%2.69%2.84%2.94%2.84%2.79%
PINCX
Putnam Income Fund
4.59%4.63%8.70%7.35%7.70%2.15%5.46%4.65%3.57%3.46%3.21%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


PINCX and ARINX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PINCX has higher volatility (0.82%) compared to ARINX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINCX dropped -30.57% vs ARINX's -9.38%.

ARINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINCX and ARINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer