PINC.TO vs. ZWB.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

PINC.TO (Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund) and ZWB.TO (BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PINC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose Investments Inc., while ZWB.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PINC.TO returned 6.92%/yr vs 16.34%/yr for ZWB.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PINC.TO charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for ZWB.TO.

Performance

PINC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINC.TO achieves a 18.40% return, which is significantly lower than ZWB.TO's 28.07% return.

PINC.TO

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 1.74%
• 6M: 17.22%
• YTD: 18.40%
• 1Y: 24.52%
• 3Y*: 14.69%
• 5Y*: 6.92%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.09%

ZWB.TO

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 1.92%
• 6M: 26.81%
• YTD: 28.07%
• 1Y: 55.64%
• 3Y*: 28.21%
• 5Y*: 16.34%
• 10Y*: 13.12%
• ALL TIME*: 11.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund	CA$10.04K	CA$9.73K	CA$12.47K
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF	CA$7.50M	CA$5.39M	CA$4.38M

PINC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund	18.40%	14.41%	11.54%	0.95%	-12.11%	21.51%	0.74%	14.28%	-6.43%
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF	28.07%	34.91%	19.41%	6.67%	-11.00%	30.81%	1.68%	14.32%	-6.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PINC.TO and ZWB.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2018	0.42

Return for Risk

PINC.TO vs. ZWB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINC.TO

PINC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PINC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PINC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PINC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PINC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ZWB.TO

ZWB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ZWB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ZWB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZWB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ZWB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PINC.TO	ZWB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.89	4.53	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.55	6.01	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.81	1.81	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.87	7.15	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.66	31.14	-4.48

PINC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.89, which is comparable to the ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINC.TO and ZWB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PINC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINC.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.84%, which is greater than ZWB.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINC.TO and ZWB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PINC.TO	ZWB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.84%	-39.36%	-4.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.59%	-7.82%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.48%	-14.05%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.04%	-25.26%	+4.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.95%	+2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.81%	-5.51%	-0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.79%	-0.86%

Volatility

PINC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) is 1.54%, while BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that PINC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZWB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PINC.TO	ZWB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	4.74%	-3.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.06%	10.74%	-5.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.35%	12.35%	-6.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.38%	12.72%	-4.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.70%	15.71%	-1.01%

PINC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINC.TO has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than ZWB.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

PINC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Dividend Comparison

PINC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than ZWB.TO's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund	4.37%	5.05%	5.48%	5.78%	5.51%	4.60%	5.33%	5.06%	3.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF	4.70%	5.38%	6.66%	7.62%	7.30%	5.46%	5.80%	5.53%	5.59%	4.80%	5.04%	5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PINC.TO and ZWB.TO in my portfolio?

PINC.TO and ZWB.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PINC.TO or ZWB.TO?

On fees, ZWB.TO is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PINC.TO or ZWB.TO?

ZWB.TO is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PINC.TO.

What is the main difference between PINC.TO and ZWB.TO?

PINC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ZWB.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments Inc. and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for PINC.TO and 0.72% for ZWB.TO.